Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gun Control & RKBA

yagotme

(4,010 posts)

10. Incompetence.

Reply to ManiacJoe (Reply #9)

Sun Dec 4, 2016, 03:13 PM

Dec 2016

I don't think it is incompetence per se. It's the combination of the deep pocket aspect plus the political views of the litigators. I'm sure these lawyers aren't exactly on the "pro-gun" side of the argument anyway.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Sandy Hook gun lawsuit moves forward in Connecticut Supreme Court [View all] TupperHappy Dec 2016 OP

You can always find a lawyer to sue for anything. Eleanors38 Dec 2016 #1

re: judicial notice discntnt_irny_srcsm Dec 2016 #2

Thanks. I thought notice was a universal within the canon of Anglo jurisprudence. Eleanors38 Dec 2016 #3

You're welcome, it could be discntnt_irny_srcsm Dec 2016 #4

Gun Banners J_William_Ryan Dec 2016 #5

This message was self-deleted by its author Duckhunter935 Dec 2016 #6

Huh - then what the hell is an "assault weapons ban"? jmg257 Dec 2016 #7

Of course you claim that, cause you know gun bans don't sell anymore. TupperHappy Dec 2016 #8

The unfortunate problem the victims have ManiacJoe Dec 2016 #9

Incompetence. yagotme Dec 2016 #10