cross post from the other group

[The Mouth]

22. So many different kinds of gun owners

I have, and like guns. I believe lethal force is potentially justified in the protection of life, liberty, and/or property.

I also know people who should *NOT*, no way, fucking ever, own a gun or have unfettered access to one.

Except for a couple with fast-access biometric locks, everything else of mine is locked away in a safe. I couldn't live with myself if one of my collection was stolen and used in a crime; it's *MY* responsibility to make sure that doesn't happen.

All rights come with limitations and responsibilities.

To the OP, I think that no one knows, or can know. More important is doing what we can to prevent nuts from getting guns, while being aware that there are distinct limitations on the burdens you can impose on a person to practice an enumerated constitutional right, be it voting, protesting, practicing their religion, or owning a firearm (as to 'well-regulated', I think we know how SCOTUS is going to interpret that).