I'm not about to argue semantics but this one point is a bit critical...
re: "...they should NOT have access to military assault rifles." They don't in general. The AR-15 is a civilian semi-auto version of the M-16. The M-16 is a military grade weapon with a top rate of fire of 700-900 rounds per minute. An AR-15 has a stated rate of fire of 45-60 rounds per minute.
Unfortunately the number of bullets required to kill is one.
There are a variety of opinions about the 2A. Why would you say it's an anachronism?
Why ban semi-autos? I'd guess close to half guns now privately owned are semi-auto. (that's maybe 150 million or more)
UBCs... I think we agree there. Registration is another matter. Just because a gun is registered doesn't mean it can't kill. Registration won't stop the insane mass shooter types.
A license to own? I'm thinking once you pass the BGC you're licensed. I do however prefer a license to carry if you plan to carry in public. I'm not a fan of what is called Constitutional Carry. I don't like open carry within town limits. IMO a lot of the OC characters are just a different version of the class clown type attention whores. Camping in the woods you can OC all you want.
Thanks for the thoughts. 
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
= new reply since forum marked as read