Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Fla_Democrat

(2,579 posts)
16. True, which is why it should be restricted....
Sat Oct 28, 2023, 10:26 PM
Oct 2023

True, which is why it should be restricted....

It was an honest answer, to the honest question.

At what point does the ability do destroy human life need to be restricted?

I still think it should be available, but no counter could support it. It would make a hell of a technical, but would have to use a 10 wheeler.




Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Should not even be a wisp of a thought to release a civilian version... MiHale Oct 2023 #1
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 2naSalit Oct 2023 #4
To the gun industry, dead children are merely collateral damage/acceptable losses for gun industry profits and political keithbvadu2 Oct 2023 #5
The military industrial complex and their lobby need Need NEED their profits. Got to pay the share holders, right? mitch96 Oct 2023 #6
ARs in this caliber have been available for civilian sales for decades hack89 Nov 2023 #19
Extremely troubling to me and I'm sure the vast majority KPN Oct 2023 #2
The increased power cartridge is an answer to the proliferation of body armor in conflict zones The Polack MSgt Oct 2023 #3
True but the new round would be helpful in killing police wearing body armor. TomSlick Oct 2023 #7
Most police body armor already get shredded by rifles DetroitLegalBeagle Oct 2023 #9
Bring back the assault weapons ban. Australia's has been very effective. brush Oct 2023 #8
Need to get the public behind this TexasDem69 Oct 2023 #13
Bullets like that have been availablefor decades for AR rifles hack89 Oct 2023 #10
30 MM Fla_Democrat Oct 2023 #11
Well, physically it has never been available over the counter. ManiacJoe Oct 2023 #14
True, which is why it should be restricted.... Fla_Democrat Oct 2023 #16
You aren't kidding. That thing is bigger than my car. Angleae Oct 2023 #17
Isn't is amazing HAB911 Oct 2023 #12
Hmmm. Lethal, military-type weapons from the military: yagotme Oct 2023 #15
The 5.56 AR design is no longer a weapon of war. SYFROYH Nov 2023 #18
The M-16 was made for spraying the jungle. pwb Dec 2023 #20
No, the Air Force pushed the M-16. yagotme Dec 2023 #22
You must know eh? pwb Dec 2023 #23
Google, much? yagotme Dec 2023 #24
So the Air Force ordered some? pwb Dec 2023 #25
They ordered the first ones, yes. yagotme Dec 2023 #26
Well you corrected me. pwb Dec 2023 #27
"No, is not a good word to lead off with it sounds pukey." yagotme Dec 2023 #28
O K pwb Dec 2023 #29
You're welcome. yagotme Dec 2023 #30
I will read your Journal for more enlightenment. pwb Dec 2023 #31
Well, that won't take long... nt yagotme Dec 2023 #33
No pwb Dec 2023 #34
Sorry to disappoint, as I don't use the Journal feature. yagotme Dec 2023 #35
Maybe I should ask questions pwb Dec 2023 #36
You have asked questions. yagotme Dec 2023 #37
My reply to the O P was a statement not a question. pwb Dec 2023 #38
You made a statement. I refuted it. The following are questions you asked me: yagotme Dec 2023 #39
Nobody has come to either of our aid so pwb Dec 2023 #40
And to you!!! yagotme Dec 2023 #41
Absolutely should be on sale anywhere and everywhere The Mouth Dec 2023 #21
That will come in handy for Trump's Turbineguy Dec 2023 #32
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»The AR platform is no lo...»Reply #16