How a conservative columnist helped push a flawed Ukraine narrative
By Paul Farhi
September 26, 2019 at 6:15 p.m. EDT
Back in March, the Hill newspaper published a series of stories and interviews that seemed, at the time, to be mainly of interest to foreign-policy wonks.
John Solomon, the papers executive vice president, interviewed Ukraines then-top prosecutor, Yuri Lutsenko, who alleged a startling conspiracy: that law enforcement officials within his country had leaked damaging information in 2016 against Paul Manafort, President Trumps former campaign chairman, to help Democrat Hillary Clintons presidential campaign.
Lutsenko also floated suggestions that Marie Yovanovitch, who was then the U.S. ambassador to Ukraine, was cooperating with the scheme to help Clinton and undermine Trumps campaign. The ambassador, Lutsenko alleged, was interfering in his ability to prosecute corruption cases and had even given him a list of defendants that he would not be allowed to prosecute, Solomon wrote.
Solomons piece urged a serious, thorough investigation of Lutsenkos claims.
The story touched off a brushfire within the conservative media, in which Solomon is a prominent figure, but stayed largely out of mainstream view.
On Thursday, however, Solomons work gained new attention and raised new questions about its sourcing, credibility and motivation.
In a complaint filed by an anonymous whistleblower, Solomons stories were cited as part of a narrative about the alleged effort by Trump and his allies to pressure Ukraines government into digging up dirt on Trumps Democratic rivals, including Clinton and Joe Biden, to enhance his prospects for reelection next year.
-snip-