Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Veterans

Showing Original Post only (View all)

unhappycamper

(60,364 posts)
Wed Sep 25, 2013, 08:14 AM Sep 2013

Pentagon could cut thousands more employees, save $50 billion, says study by former chiefs [View all]

http://www.startribune.com/politics/national/225064822.html

Pentagon could cut thousands more employees, save $50 billion, says study by former chiefs
Article by: PAULINE JELINEK , Associated Press
Updated: September 24, 2013 - 2:25 PM

WASHINGTON — The Defense Department could shed 60,000 more troops than planned and 50,000 civilian employees without hurting U.S. fighting power, four former members of the Pentagon's Joint Chiefs of Staff said in a new report on military strategy and spending.

Nearly $50 billion in budget cuts are recommended in the report released Tuesday and authored by a 17-member panel including two former vice chairmen of the joint chiefs, a former Air Force chief and former Navy chief. Writing for the Stimson Center think tank, the authors suggested cuts they said would replace future rounds of automatic, across-the-board cuts in the Pentagon's budget called for in a deficit reduction deal two years ago. The Stimson Center is a nonpartisan global security group in Washington.

The biggest proposed saving — $22.4 billion in the fiscal year starting October next year— would come in cutting overhead such as civilian employees, headquarters staff and contractors as well as reforming pension and health programs, the report said.

"The Defense Department is not a jobs program," Barry M. Blechman, one of the authors and a Stimson co-founder, said in a Capitol Hill conference where the report was released. He said lawmakers have "stood in the way" of some of the cuts because they mean job losses among constituents.



unhappycamper comment: Note the DoD goes after people first; the MIC big boys get a free pass.
18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Reforming pension and health programs." Stargazer09 Sep 2013 #1
More force shaping ahead! Early outs, tougher PT tests, more drug testing, etc.... MADem Sep 2013 #2
They should be eliminating most of the contractor and replacing them with qualified returning ... Historic NY Sep 2013 #4
That ends up costing more in some cases. MADem Sep 2013 #5
Your are incorrect. westerebus Sep 2013 #9
No, I'm not. In the end--and I see nothing wrong with this practice, but it is a fact--the vet MADem Sep 2013 #10
We get 5 points for being veterns on the exams we take for qualification too. westerebus Sep 2013 #12
No, I don't this is "unfair" at all. It's a benefit of service. MADem Sep 2013 #13
I am in no way being "shitty" with you. westerebus Sep 2013 #14
Then do it! gopiscrap Sep 2013 #3
Sounds good, but that's another 110,000 on the street... TreasonousBastard Sep 2013 #6
From my perspective the problem starts here: unhappycamper Sep 2013 #7
Always has been, but... TreasonousBastard Sep 2013 #8
That's not the national budget, though. MADem Sep 2013 #11
The military budget is in discretionary spending, not mandatory spending. unhappycamper Sep 2013 #15
And discretionary spending is less than a third of the total budget. MADem Sep 2013 #16
And the military budget comes out of the same (Discretionary) pie as Labor, Education, Science, etc. unhappycamper Sep 2013 #17
Yes, it's 57 percent of thirty percent. nt MADem Sep 2013 #18
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Veterans»Pentagon could cut thousa...»Reply #0