Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProfessorGAC

(71,139 posts)
15. I Totally Disagree
Wed Apr 6, 2022, 05:30 PM
Apr 2022

Games take 51 minutes longer now than in 1980, and that was 12 minutes longer than 1960.
It's the same 9 inning game.
People have examined commercial time in 1980 & now. 3.2 minutes per hour.
So, we've accounted for 7 or 8 minutes. Out of 51.
The other 43 minutes of watching hitters adjust gloves (often without even swinging at the prior pitch: & they're wearing $180 batting gloves; how much adjusting is needed?). Pitchers shaking off 5 signs. Hitters stepping out to get signals from the bench instead of from the base coach.
There is no added fan experience derived from all that wasted time. Nobody goes to the game to watch stall tactics.
The price of the game is irrelevant. Major sports became made for TV decades ago. When a game draws 40,000 people, 40 times that are watching on TV. At least. And TV ratings are falling.
And, it costs nothing extra to watch the game on television.
The game needs to be sped up.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Baseball»MLB looking at electronic...»Reply #15