Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProfessorGAC

(70,835 posts)
3. I Like It!
Tue May 24, 2022, 05:09 PM
May 2022

As long as it punishes the time wasting hitters, too.
Games literally take 51 minutes longer on average, than they were 45 years ago.
There are 30 seconds of extra ads each half inning. That's only 9 minutes.
The other 42 minutes add NOTHING to the fan experience.
If only half of that is caused by dawdling (and I think that's understated), 21 minutes of dead time is eliminated.
I don't watch games for, & most fans don't go to see an extra 21 minutes (at least) of zero action.
I honestly don't understand the purism that resists this idea.
I would think such purism would be rooted in the pace of play as it was for the first 120 years of the professional game. If so, how could a purist/traditionalist oppose it?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Ridiculous, imo. SheltieLover May 2022 #1
IMO it's worth trying. The game needs help as... brush May 2022 #2
I Like It! ProfessorGAC May 2022 #3
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Baseball»6 things I learned watchi...»Reply #3