Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Religion

In reply to the discussion: Who knew? [View all]

Act_of_Reparation

(9,116 posts)
1. The Lemon Test
Tue Mar 19, 2019, 12:49 PM
Mar 2019

Does the law:

1) Have a legitimate secular purpose?
2) Not have the primary effect of advancing or inhibiting the practice of religion?
3) Not result in excessive entanglement of government and religion?


If the answer to these three questions is "yes", then the law is fair game. Or it should be. With this supreme court, who knows.



Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Who knew? [View all] uriel1972 Mar 2019 OP
The Lemon Test Act_of_Reparation Mar 2019 #1
When you think they can't go any lower Lordquinton Mar 2019 #2
OMG Are these people real? gtar100 Mar 2019 #3
We have a DUer who parrots out RCC talking points on why they should be exempt Major Nikon Mar 2019 #4
Attorney-General Gordon Ramsay said.... guillaumeb Mar 2019 #5
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Who knew?»Reply #1