Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Religion

guillaumeb

(42,649 posts)

18. I remember your outraged reaction when I pointed out one of your mispellings.

Reply to MineralMan (Reply #17)

Sat Jun 1, 2019, 06:35 PM

Jun 2019

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

34 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

History of religion [View all] Major Nikon May 2019 OP

How insightful. guillaumeb May 2019 #1

It's the first time I've seen it. MineralMan Jun 2019 #5

It appeals to your own views. guillaumeb Jun 2019 #6

Yes, but not to yours... MineralMan Jun 2019 #7

It is simplistic. guillaumeb Jun 2019 #8

You have convinced yourself of that, I agree. MineralMan Jun 2019 #9

That "lacks details" is an accurate way to condemn it. guillaumeb Jun 2019 #10

You are amusing, Monsieur B. MineralMan Jun 2019 #11

You are predictable. guillaumeb Jun 2019 #12

I'm not familiar with the word: rassenble MineralMan Jun 2019 #13

Excusez moi. A bas mon ordi. guillaumeb Jun 2019 #15

Did you mean: MineralMan Jun 2019 #14

Z'etes parfait, vous? guillaumeb Jun 2019 #16

Nope. Not perfect. MineralMan Jun 2019 #17

I remember your outraged reaction when I pointed out one of your mispellings. guillaumeb Jun 2019 #18

Do you? Show me, then... MineralMan Jun 2019 #19

Encore, z'etes parfait, vous? guillaumeb Jun 2019 #20

No. I think of myself as a sundae. MineralMan Jun 2019 #21

On Saturday? guillaumeb Jun 2019 #22

What's to condemn? Cartoonist Jun 2019 #24

Yes, easily understood.... guillaumeb Jun 2019 #29

History itself lacks detail Major Nikon Jun 2019 #23

It's a joke. Act_of_Reparation Jun 2019 #25

It sounded better in his head Major Nikon Jun 2019 #28

Cartoonist disagrees. eom guillaumeb Jun 2019 #30

Thanks for posting edhopper May 2019 #2

oh dear the cartoon doesn't mention the vast multitudes murdered by religionists nt msongs May 2019 #3

Doesn't mention children still being raped either Major Nikon May 2019 #4

Engels on religion RedParrot Jun 2019 #26

I find it accurate and amusing, too. flying_wahini Jun 2019 #27

Pathetically over simplistic. gtar100 Jun 2019 #31

Simplicity is a significant part of the point you are missing Major Nikon Jun 2019 #32

Huh? It portrays religiosity as consistently Voltaire2 Jun 2019 #33

At least the rocks exist in reality and can be seen... NeoGreen Jun 2019 #34