Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ocelot II

(121,860 posts)
4. I've always figured that the concept of the Trinity was just the slippery argument
Mon Oct 28, 2024, 02:39 PM
Oct 28

the Council of Nicaea came up with to keep from painting themselves into a theological corner. Christianity, conceptually and traditionally a spin-off from Judaism, was supposed to be monotheistic. But if Jesus was also supposed to be divine, that might mean there was more than one god. So now that you've got at least one extra god to try fit into that monotheistic structure somehow, what do you do with him? You come up with a doctrine where Jesus and God are kind of the same entity, along with the Holy Spirit, whatever that is, even though Jesus was also a man, at least for awhile. But as long as you've got a single divine entity that is comprised of three god-entities, you've still got your monotheism and you're off the hook and you don't have to argue that Christianity is a whole new religion when it was supposed to be the fulfillment of the old one.

That's my theory and I'm sticking to it.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Christian Liberals & Progressive People of Faith»Christian nondualism? Non...»Reply #4