Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Karadeniz

(23,662 posts)
1. As one of the lady liberal justices wrote, "What part of this (decision) isn't about religion?" She
Mon Jun 27, 2022, 06:20 PM
Jun 2022

should've said fundamentalism and evangelism to be more precise...
which is exactly why Thomas Jefferson was advised to not hire Christian teachers from Europe when he was staffing his new university... they're just trouble makers! Jefferson even put religious gathering spots outside the university boundaries. Religion per se must be kept out of legal decision making. This latest ruling on the coach conducting Christian prayer in public viewed as free speech. Free speech can occur in the locker room or in an office. It doesn't need an audience. The coach is using a proChristian court to grandstand. I'm so glad a Jew is challenging this ridiculous decision and I hope he shows the prejudicial nature of the decision.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Jewish Group»The hypocrisy of Christia...»Reply #1