Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

muriel_volestrangler

(102,811 posts)
7. No, this is minutes of time (for the period of the orbit around the larger asteroid), not angle
Thu Oct 13, 2022, 01:20 PM
Oct 2022
The observed decreases in relative brightness for each night’s dataset correspond to Dimorphos eclipses from a new orbital period of 11 hours and 23 minutes – demonstrating that the eclipse timing differs from pre-impact period of 11 hours and 55 minutes.

https://www.nasa.gov/feature/nasa-dart-imagery-shows-changed-orbit-of-target-asteroid

An orbit with a shorter period has less energy (eg it needs less energy to send a satellite into a low orbit around Earth that takes around 100 minutes, than to put it into a geostationary orbit that takes 24 hours). So they know that they took a significant amount of kinetic energy out of this asteroid by hitting it 'head on'. If they can work out its mass accurately (which such a close-up view may help with), they will know how much.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»"The DART spacecraft chan...»Reply #7