Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Science

1WorldHope

(999 posts)

1. I read your post to the best of my ability.

Reply to NNadir (Original post)

Sun Mar 5, 2023, 06:55 PM

Mar 2023

I have no formal, nor informal, education in the sciences. But I think someone missed the boat for me growing up. I am fascinated by physics and biology and astronomy.
That aside, I really would be interested in this being sorted out. Are you saying that nuclear energy could save us? I would be one of those fools fearing nuclear waste. If that is not true. .. then holy crap, let's talk more. How much carbon do you think nuclear energy could replace?
Fascinating stuff.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

A systematic "omics" (molecular biology) approach to the effects of radiation on living tissue. [View all] NNadir Mar 2023 OP

I read your post to the best of my ability. 1WorldHope Mar 2023 #1

I apologize for overlooking your post. NNadir Mar 2023 #2

If what you say is true, who silenced those who could make a difference? 1WorldHope Mar 2023 #3

Not entirely off topic, but tangential ... the oldest known fossils (so far) ... eppur_se_muova Mar 2023 #4

I'm not sure that resistance to radiation was important to life forms 3 billion years ago. NNadir Mar 2023 #5