I'll be damned if I can find out what the "syn gas power constant" is. [View all]
Generally, when I come across a term used, often utilized knowingly in some esoteric field, with which I am unfamiliar but in some context of interest, I try to find out what the term means.
I came across this paper yesterday: Impacts of Interaction between Active Components on Catalyst Deactivation over KFe/ZSM-5 Bifunctional Catalyst Di Xu, Haifeng Fan, Kaidi Liu, Guoqiang Hou, Chuan Qin, Yanfei Xu, Rui Li, Junhu Wang, and Mingyue Ding ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 2023 11 (28), 10441-10452.
This concerns an energy process that I actually oppose, coal gasification by steam reforming to produce hydrogen - a very, very, very dirty fuel - and carbon dioxide, to make what are normally petroleum based fuels, such as gasoline, jet fuel, diesel fuel, etc. This process, which was industrialized in Nazi Germany, in Apartheid era South Africa, and was an element of Jimmy Carter's energy program although the industrialization in the US has (thankfully) remained limited but for a few specialized commodity plants, is known at the Fisher-Tropsch (FT) process.
(I favor the hydrogenation of carbon dioxide to methanol and ultimately the wonder fuel DME, but only in the case where the primary energy source of hydrogen is nuclear energy using, ideally, thermochemical processes, and wet or dry reformation of wastes.)
I am interested in general in bifunctional catalysts, not for FT purposes, but because these types of catalysts have been explored for the direct hydrogenation of carbon dioxide to DME (dimethyl ether) without the production of a methanol intermediate.
So I scanned the paper and came across this sentence:
I had never heard of the Anderson-Schulz-Flory distribution, so I referred to reference 18, which is this one, dated from 73 years ago:
Composition of Synthetic Liquid Fuels. I. Product Distribution and Analysis of C5C8 Paraffin Isomers from Cobalt Catalyst1 R. A. Friedel and R. B. Anderson Journal of the American Chemical Society 1950 72 (3), 1212-1215
It has the following text, here presented as a graphic object:
This may or may not define the modern term "syn gas power constant," which comes up flowing around this idea, as described in this paper:
Selectivity of the FischerTropsch process: deviations from single alpha product distribution explained by gradients in process conditions Katrina D. Kruit David Vervloet Freek Kapteijn and J. Ruud van Ommen, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2013,3, 2210-2213
I suspect that the "syn gas power constant" is actually involved with equation 9 in this table from this paper, the "Vervloet" paper (same research group):
FischerTropsch reactiondiffusion in a cobalt catalyst particle: aspects of activity and selectivity for a variable chain growth probability David Vervloet, Freek Kapteijn, John Nijenhuis and J. Ruud van Ommen Catal. Sci. Technol., 2012, 2, 1221-1233
The reality is I'm never going to want to use this "syn gas power constant" and I can't believe, with my life running out, that I spent time wondering all about it, since I rather despise the entire idea of coal based hydrogen and/or coal based syn fuels.
When I waste time this way, I feel disturbed about myself.
The FT idea sucks, and in the time of extreme climate change we are now clearly entering, it's an idea that should be abhorrent, although this FT concept is related to the awful marketing scheme represented by marketing fossil fuels as "green hydrogen."
You can read all about it in the wildland industrialization forum.
Happy Friday.