A large-scale genome-wide association study meta-analysis of cannabis use disorder.

[hlthe2b]

5. I said it is a flawed analysis. Not that the Lancet is garbage

And I have the digital copy of paper right here, thank you very much. Meta analyses are especially prone to comparison of apples and oranges--especially without a clearly defined outcome that is consistent across all studies. And "Cannabis Use Disorder" is a classification that includes a lot of "lumping."

And yes, the epidemiological adage that "garbage in (in terms of inputs) = Garbage out (in terms of results) does apply.