Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cab67

(3,244 posts)
18. That's because that's what the evidence showed.
Wed Sep 20, 2023, 08:01 PM
Sep 2023

No one thought these people were stupid or incapable of doing these things.

Based on everything we'd found previously, wooden structures weren't known from that era.

And it was actually reasonable to suspect they weren't being made, too - or not being made on a widespread scale, anyway. The stone and bone tools used primarily at the time would not work very efficiently with wood.

By the way, we don't need to see the wood to identify traces of wooden stuctures, Houses and huts made of wood typically require post-holes, for example. Otherwise, the structure would collapse very easily. Post-hole fills are easily identified at archaeological sites. They've never been found at sites from that period of time.

(Full disclosure - I"m not my self an archaeologist. But I work closely with them for some of my work.)

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I'm not a professional in this area. But, I'd like to share some thoughts. 1WorldHope Sep 2023 #1
Agree. The Unmitigated Gall Sep 2023 #2
I don't think that's what's thought. It's just that wooden structure ususally don't... brush Sep 2023 #3
It says that it was thought that humans' use of wood was limited Bristlecone Sep 2023 #4
True, but quite often that's whats assumed of societies in Africa... brush Sep 2023 #6
Makes sense Bristlecone Sep 2023 #7
It's a credit to this team that they didn't do that. brush Sep 2023 #9
That's because that's what the evidence showed. cab67 Sep 2023 #18
I think the awareness that babies have gets smothered by cultural norms at a very young age. What a housecat Sep 2023 #13
Exactly, our assumptions limit us. 1WorldHope Sep 2023 #21
KNR and thank you for sharing this fascinating information. niyad Sep 2023 #5
My Tongue in cheek response Dem_in_Nebr. Sep 2023 #8
interstellar log cabin skills prodigitalson Sep 2023 #11
what species of hominid did this? prodigitalson Sep 2023 #10
From the second link: Sky Jewels Sep 2023 #14
Thanks prodigitalson Sep 2023 #20
It wasn't that scientists didn't think it was possible Red Mountain Sep 2023 #12
Got wood? LudwigPastorius Sep 2023 #15
500M year Tool Man Pas-de-Calais Sep 2023 #16
They call it the Stone Age because that's about all that survived this long Warpy Sep 2023 #17
respectfully disagree on one point cab67 Sep 2023 #19
Then how was one dated to 560,000 years ago found in sediment in England? Warpy Sep 2023 #25
No mention of wood there muriel_volestrangler Sep 2023 #26
............ Warpy Sep 2023 #27
Really? When the article specifically says it was for butchering? muriel_volestrangler Sep 2023 #28
500,000 years ago is pre-Neanderthal - no, these didn't have bigger brains than us muriel_volestrangler Sep 2023 #22
It was H. Heidelbergensis, thought to be the ancestor species Warpy Sep 2023 #24
And the list of *intelligent* species who went extinct grows longer again. eppur_se_muova Sep 2023 #23
Archaeologists Uncover Notched Logs That May Be the Oldest Known Wooden Structure Judi Lynn Sep 2023 #29
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»Half-million-year-old woo...»Reply #18