Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NNadir

(34,890 posts)
2. The energy content of hydrogen is actually irrelevant, since it is made from fossil fuels...
Sat Oct 7, 2023, 07:22 PM
Oct 2023

...with the destruction of exergy.

Under the actual conditions it's a case of a perpetual motion machine.

Were it made by increasing exergy of high temperature nuclear thermochemical cycles, there might be circumstances where it could be burned, if in excess over the production of fluid fuels such as DME or methanol - or less desirable, Fischer Tropsch fuels - it might prove useful for load leveling, but in an intelligently run world this would be a rare circumstance.

It's a valuable captive intermediate, but its physical properties make it useless, and in fact, dangerous, as a consumer product.

My son's masters degree was in welding special alloys, and we discussed hydrogen embrittlement in this context a number of times. His Ph.D. program is in nuclear engineering, specifically nuclear materials.

I'm trying, with some light success, to push him in the general direction of high temperature refractories, but I'm not his advisor.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»Hydrogen Embrittlement Ba...»Reply #2