Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Atheists & Agnostics

Showing Original Post only (View all)

onager

(9,356 posts)
Sat Oct 3, 2015, 11:57 AM Oct 2015

Atheist Maryam Namazie banned, unbanned from speaking [View all]

The exiled Iranian atheist Maryam Namazie was recently invited to speak at Warwick University in the UK.

Then she got un-invited, apparently because someone was afraid she would say Bad Things about Islam.

The cyber-verse blew up, with Namazie being supported by Salman Rushdie, Jerry Coyne and many others.

Richard Dawkins tweeted: "She’s a hero to all a university stands for. But cowardly useful idiots of Warwick have banned @MaryamNamazie.”

Apparently the university then changed its mind again and re-invited her.

And lo! Along comes The Guardian's very own Useful Idiot, David Shariatmadari. To explain with 50 or so rhetorical questions why Namazie wasn't REALLY banned ("The govt. didn't ban her&quot . And those poor, put-upon Muslims really are Special Snowflakes who need extraordinary protection from criticism:

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/oct/01/university-of-warwick-maryam-namazie-activist

Which drew a response from one woman commenter that made me want to stand up and cheer. She lives in the UK but her comments just MIGHT be applicable to a few other English-speaking countries:

I am on the Left and I am sick of excuses being made for knuckle-dragging clericofascists just because they are Muslim. A clericofascist is a clericofascist. They need to be challenged. I had hoped that, in this country, we were finally winning the battles on women's and LGBTQ rights; that religious privilege was being kicked into touch. Now we are having to refight some of these battles because some misguided folk are buying into a bogus victim narrative about oppressive misogynistic religion.
19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Oppressive mysogynists are oppressive mysogynists even if that's their religion. Binkie The Clown Oct 2015 #1
Yep, it seems to be a defining criterion in a lot of cases. bvf Oct 2015 #3
What an outstanding response! beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #2
I agree. Behind the Aegis Oct 2015 #7
This is a very good comparison Lordquinton Oct 2015 #8
One slight problem with your comparision... Behind the Aegis Oct 2015 #9
All in context reffered to both male and female Lordquinton Oct 2015 #14
Yep, whenever you see the term "new atheists" it's a dog whistle for the anti-atheists. beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #10
The thing with the Pope was really upsetting. Behind the Aegis Oct 2015 #11
And it's really unfair because there are so few lgbt people here who dare speak up anymore. beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #12
Many learned "our place" the last time. Behind the Aegis Oct 2015 #13
Right? Do people really not realize how that sounds??? beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #15
What is 'crazy' is when someone rails against that phrase for one group... Behind the Aegis Oct 2015 #16
Yes! Or I have ________ in my extended family. Therefore I am _________. beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #17
Summed up perfectly in this meme... Behind the Aegis Oct 2015 #18
! beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #19
Well, we can't have university students exposed to unconventional ideas. Curmudgeoness Oct 2015 #4
I love "clericofascists" Jim Lane Oct 2015 #5
Excellent progressoid Oct 2015 #6
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Atheists & Agnostics»Atheist Maryam Namazie ba...»Reply #0