Edwina Rogers Dismisses Claims in Her Lawsuit Against Richard Dawkins and Atheist Lobbying Group

[muriel_volestrangler]

Last May, Edwina Rogers (below) sued the Secular Coalition for America, her former employer, alleging that SCA leaders wrongfully terminated her and then made defamatory statements about her to the press. They were motivated, the document said, by “petty jealousies and naked ambition.”

Rogers also said that SCA President (at the time) Amanda Metskas and/or SCA Education Fund Treasurer Roy Speckhardt (of the American Humanist Association) found a way to leak information to New York Times reporters in order to get ahead of the story:
...
An amended version of Rogers’ lawsuit also included charges against Richard Dawkins — that he was taking money from his own foundation and enlisting his allies in retaliation against her.
...
Instead, Rogers chose to end her lawsuit voluntarily before that encounter could take place:

Plaintiff Edwina Rogers and Defendants Amanda Metskas and Secular Coalition for America, Inc., (“SCA”) stipulate to dismissal of her claims against SCA and Ms. Metskas.
…
Plaintiff Edwina Rogers voluntarily dismisses her claims against Defendants Secular Coalition for America Education Fund, Inc., Greg R. Langer, Roy Speckhardt, and Richard Dawkins.

http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2016/02/27/edwina-rogers-dismisses-claims-in-her-lawsuit-against-richard-dawkins-and-atheist-lobbying-group/

Which I'm guessing means she had launched the suit in hope of being able to find some evidence for people agreeing to get rid of her, and couldn't.