Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Manifestor_of_Light

(21,046 posts)
4. Doctors argued that women shouldn't get anesthetics in childbirth because of the bible.
Mon Mar 28, 2016, 04:32 PM
Mar 2016


This was in the 19th century when they discovered ether and chloroform. After Queen Victoria had her 8th and her 9th children with the aid of chloroform, I think attitudes changed.



Dr. John Snow, May 14, 1853: The Lancet, British medical journal, criticized Dr. Snow but not by name, and Queen Victoria's physicians for the use of chloroform during the birth of Prince Leopold.
http://www.ph.ucla.edu/epi/snow/victoria.html

I assume these asshole male doctors think so little of women that they would gladly let women die in childbirth rather than do a c-section, like they do nowadays in many cases to prevent maternal and fetal death.

I am a grown woman, and had a person here on DU argue with me that "they just needed to turn the baby" after I told her that I HAD to have a C-section or I would have died, because there was simply not enough room, and I am a small person. This woman, who I assume is a natural childbirth nut, said I "must have a deformed pelvis". I am perfectly normal and do not have a deformed pelvis. It's just not big enough and she didn't get the concept. The hole in a woman's pelvis has to be 4 inches in diameter (approximately 10 cm) to be big enough for the baby's head to get through.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Atheists & Agnostics»Christians refuse to admi...»Reply #4