Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

D Gary Grady

(133 posts)
8. In fact, the footnote was in reference to something else anyway
Tue Apr 19, 2016, 12:05 AM
Apr 2016

As I recall, the footnote, based on one of legal briefs submitted, noted that there are religions that do not involve belief in a god or gods, such as Confucianism, most sorts of Buddhism, and "secular humanism." But the "secular humanism" in question was the doctrine of a specific organization (not the AHA or Ethical Culture but some small group), not what people now usually mean by "secular humanism." There was an article in Free Inquiry a couple of decades back written by one of the lawyers involved in the case that explained this.

In any even, as you say, it was not a decision of the court but a passing remark -- an obiter dictum.

Re the general idea that atheism is somehow a religion, my favorite response is that atheism is a religion in the same sense that not collecting stamps is a hobby. (I wish I knew who first said that.)

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Atheists & Agnostics»Simple Rebuttals to Commo...»Reply #8