Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Skepticism, Science & Pseudoscience

(46,896 posts)

2. They claim.

Wed Mar 9, 2016, 12:52 PM

Mar 2016

The fact is, raw milk does *NOT* have any of these wonderful "health" things in it, that pasteurizing "takes out."

This is woo.

And it's dangerous.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

15 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Latest woo in some states... [View all] Archae Mar 2016 OP

"Some of those who got sick...did not drink the milk." Wilms Mar 2016 #1

They claim. Archae Mar 2016 #2

You shouldn't drink it. Wilms Mar 2016 #3

Ah, now you're promoting anit-public health stances? HuckleB Mar 2016 #4

Well gee Huck, Wilms Mar 2016 #5

Well, you could stop promoting anti-public health POVs. HuckleB Mar 2016 #6

Four words into it and "crank"? Wilms Mar 2016 #7

LOL! HuckleB Mar 2016 #8

No agenda on some of those. Wilms Mar 2016 #9

So, you think helmet laws are bad, too? HuckleB Mar 2016 #10

Call me a skeptic. Wilms Mar 2016 #11

You are no skeptic. HuckleB Mar 2016 #12

Have a nice evening, sir. n/t Wilms Mar 2016 #13

That's cute. You keep working to make the world a worse place. HuckleB Mar 2016 #14

Apparently the incident is now being investigated. progressoid Mar 2016 #15