Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Occupy Underground

ProgressiveProfessor

(22,144 posts)

3. Not so much...

Reply to limpyhobbler (Reply #1)

Sun Feb 24, 2013, 10:30 PM

Feb 2013

ND has the distinction of having the only criminal apprehension based on the use of a Federal drone.

This law in no way restricts private use, just that of the state and local government. If SHARK want to continue to provide targets and does in ND, they can.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

North Dakota legislature passes a law requiring warrants for any drone surveillance [View all] Fire Walk With Me Feb 2013 OP

I think in states with a lot agriculture what is happening is the limpyhobbler Feb 2013 #1

Not so much... ProgressiveProfessor Feb 2013 #3

So this restricts the gov't from using drones to bust big farms for pollution & labor violations? limpyhobbler Feb 2013 #6

SHARK is a PETA like organization who has had its drones shot down ProgressiveProfessor Feb 2013 #8

This is not surprising. ND is the only state where a Federal UAV was used in a criminal event ProgressiveProfessor Feb 2013 #2

I remember that. DHS treats the borders differently. All 100 miles inland from them as well. Fire Walk With Me Feb 2013 #5

it's a start...from ND to DC nt msongs Feb 2013 #4

fun drone info!!! warrprayer Feb 2013 #7