Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Demeter

(85,373 posts)
4. I suppose a State Police representative goes to the individual
Fri May 3, 2013, 04:53 AM
May 2013

to verify his status as to (in)eligibility to own a gun, demands the guns or information as to where they went, if the disqualified person is no longer in possession. And then, the State updates the files accordingly. If one is no longer licensed or legal to own guns, the State could demand their surrender without any legal wrangling. Raids wouldn't be required unless there was non-compliance, and in that case, as it is a felony for the disqualified individual to own, there's no legal issues as to the propriety of a raid.



I'm assuming that one doesn't renew the gun license every year (no personal experience), as one does with cars. The only reason they demand yearly renewals of car license plates is for taxation...I don't even know if the State correlates car ownership with driving license validity...Maybe gun ownership should be taxed. It's a means of constantly updating the database, and brings in revenue, too.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Occupy Underground»California governor Jerry...»Reply #4