Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Fire Walk With Me

(38,893 posts)
8. Very good points. There are more than one type of drone, and DARPA's drone flies at 20K'.
Sun May 5, 2013, 09:36 AM
May 2013

But that one is more for following people than for using electronic surveillance to check on what is occurring in any particular home. Theoretically there must be some degree of proximity for this to occur, albeit not noticeable proximity. I imagine that WIFI is as vulnerable to spying by drones as is the visible spectrum via cameras. I posted an article here a bit back regarding DHS having placed spy tech in domestic drones despite having claimed not doing so. It will pay to bone up if you are an activist, although of course in so doing, you will present "negative space" equally as "visible".

Fuck the security state and its neocon/plutonomy/Bush family masters.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Occupy Underground»Tiny Device Will Detect D...»Reply #8