Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MADem

(135,425 posts)
1. IF we can use the kidnapper's money to pay all ransoms, I say pay ransoms as needed.
Thu Aug 18, 2016, 01:25 PM
Aug 2016

This is a right wing meme. The use of the word "ransom" is absurd in this context.

A quid pro quo is not a ransom--and that's what this was, an exchange.

We don't "sort of" owe Iran money. We TOOK their money in exchange for weapons, and then we didn't deliver the weapons. We owed them either the weapons, or their money back.


A ransom is when one party gets fucked over in exchange for the lives of others. Someone enjoys a "net loss" when a ransom is extracted.

In this case, both parties had something "owed" to them. The timing of the payback was, simply, coordinated.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Middle East»Iran Payment Wasn’t Ranso...»Reply #1