Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

History of Feminism

Showing Original Post only (View all)

boston bean

(36,530 posts)
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 06:56 AM Dec 2013

We aren't the only ones who experience this on the net... [View all]

MRA Debating Tactics (Humorous, But All Too True)

(Note: they all start as, “MRA debating: …”, which I’m simply leaving out for the sake of avoiding repetition. Also, I’ve extended and embellished some of them beyond the original character length to be more precise in what I mean.)

1. Mock feminists until they’re angry, then say, “See? I told you feminists are all just angry bitches pissed off at men.” Self-fulfilling prophecies are always a good tactic.

2. Be polite, at least until your friends show up, then attack en masse to overwhelm. And don’t actually win the debate, just fight. Intellectualism is so tedious, after all, and some anti-MRM people are really quite good at it.

3. Ask for research and evidence, then dismiss it all arbitrarily with no explanation when given and say that feminists have no evidence. It doesn’t matter that feminists actually do have entire fields of research to back them up, or statistics, or experts, and that you don’t have any. If you won’t admit her evidence, it doesn’t have to matter!

4. Define patriarchy as “rule of fathers”, and then show how fathers don’t rule so you can say patriarchy isn’t real, completely avoiding any actual discussion of patriarchy as an anthropological and sociological phenomenon. Indeed, it’s best to avoid actual science and research altogether, that shit is hard to understand.

5. Wrongly accuse feminists of committing logical fallacies even when it’s apparent that you don’t have a firm grasp on propositional logic. Hope everyone won’t notice, and hope everyone assumes that logical fallacies assert the falsehood of a statement. They don’t, but if no one notices, you’re good!

6. You don’t need intellectual integrity. If one of your buddies is clearly losing a debate with a feminist, jump in and back up his arguments no matter how stupid or ineffectual they are. The more the merrier!


there are thirty examples at the link, and I recognize every single one of them.

http://eseld.tumblr.com/post/54266865213/mra-debating-tactics-humorous-but-all-too-true


12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Entertaining article cinnabonbon Dec 2013 #1
My favorites, (less seen in favor of snark) ismnotwasm Dec 2013 #2
That one caught my eye too. Especially this: Squinch Dec 2013 #3
... ismnotwasm Dec 2013 #5
I can't see them as admirable in any way, shape, or form. redqueen Dec 2013 #6
I'd luuuv to see this crossposted in GD :) xulamaude Dec 2013 #4
So would I! CTyankee Jan 2014 #11
Great article! smirkymonkey Dec 2013 #7
Kick for exposure redqueen Jan 2014 #8
It's an interesting discussion ismnotwasm Jan 2014 #9
Kicking Squinch Jan 2014 #10
very useful mahina Jan 2014 #12
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»History of Feminism»We aren't the only ones w...»Reply #0