Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
History of Feminism
In reply to the discussion: The soft war against women [View all]ismnotwasm
(42,481 posts)17. You know reading that
I don know if there is another way to have a revolution--a century long revolution, but the last 40 years plus changing economics get frightened men to react badly. There's genuine hatred as well, but it used to be more about who owns women's sexuality, now there's a realization that's ain't it anymore it's jobs and position. Women are in college but aren't in top, decision making positions
Take a look at this
This is a list of women who currently hold CEO positions at companies that rank on the 2013 Fortune 1000 lists. Women currently hold 4.2 percent of Fortune 500 CEO positions and 4.5 percent of Fortune 1000 CEO positions.
http://www.catalyst.org/knowledge/women-ceos-fortune-1000
Or this at Harvard
When the committee extended its analysis, Kramer reported, some fields and many departments across FAS are doing well relative to peers [at other institutions] and to the rate at which Ph.D.s are being awarded. Thus, she discounted general leakage from the academic pipeline that siphons women out of Harvards faculty ranks. Rather, she focused on the demographics of several large FAS departments, compared to peer institutions, to highlight seemingly large disparitieswith Harvard trailing well behind the peer mean proportion of tenure-track women in economics, government, and English, for example. She concluded that in at least some instances, Harvard is doing less well at recruiting, attracting candidates, and sustaining tenure-track women facultyat every step of the process.
(Such concerns have prompted deeper inquiry. Lee professor of economics Claudia Goldin, president of the American Economic Association, has begun investigating the disproportionately male enrollment in undergraduate economics concentrations. She has found pervasive unawareness of this gendered skew in economics departments, and suggests that womens disproportional early attrition from the field, after introductory courses, raises the need to rework the curriculum to stress the disciplines utility in analyzing socioeconomic problems, not solely its business and finance applications.)
http://harvardmagazine.com/2013/09/where-the-women-aren-t
Or this report of women in medical leadership positions (stat heavy)
https://www.aamc.org/members/gwims/statistics/#.Ur4aGH-9KK0
I can find many more examples.
So a soft war is a good term, I do know that our foot is in many doors threatening what's been taken for granted for years and years. So frightened people, include into some feminists who think it's still about sexuality are only partially right--we are actual competition now, not because we are female, but because we can do the job. You know--the ones 50 years or so ago society thought we couldn't do.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
23 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
wow."if girls learn that behaving like sexual objects earns them approval... they may self-sexualize
hlthe2b
May 2012
#2
most disheartening thing I have seen...women to become the tool of the patriarchy
seabeyond
May 2012
#3
i had a man agressively argue with me on du, that women connect emotion to sex
seabeyond
May 2012
#8
kicking for the fun of it. looking for something particular, but we sure have some great stuff way
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#14
we can do the job. You know--the ones 50 years or so ago society thought we couldn't do.
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#18
The men at Yale were terribly oppressed by the PROMINENT presence of a WOMEN'S CENTER
CTyankee
Jan 2014
#21