Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ismnotwasm

(42,481 posts)
17. You know reading that
Fri Dec 27, 2013, 07:32 PM
Dec 2013

I don know if there is another way to have a revolution--a century long revolution, but the last 40 years plus changing economics get frightened men to react badly. There's genuine hatred as well, but it used to be more about who owns women's sexuality, now there's a realization that's ain't it anymore it's jobs and position. Women are in college but aren't in top, decision making positions

Take a look at this

This is a list of women who currently hold CEO positions at companies that rank on the 2013 Fortune 1000 lists. Women currently hold 4.2 percent of Fortune 500 CEO positions and 4.5 percent of Fortune 1000 CEO positions.

http://www.catalyst.org/knowledge/women-ceos-fortune-1000

Or this at Harvard



When the committee extended its analysis, Kramer reported, some fields and many departments across FAS “are doing well relative to peers [at other institutions] and to the rate at which Ph.D.s are being awarded.” Thus, she discounted general “leakage” from the academic pipeline that siphons women out of Harvard’s faculty ranks. Rather, she focused on the demographics of several large FAS departments, compared to peer institutions’, to highlight seemingly large disparities—with Harvard trailing well behind the peer mean proportion of tenure-track women in economics, government, and English, for example. She concluded that in at least some instances, Harvard is doing less well at recruiting, attracting candidates, and sustaining tenure-track women faculty—“at every step of the process.”

(Such concerns have prompted deeper inquiry. Lee professor of economics Claudia Goldin, president of the American Economic Association, has begun investigating the disproportionately male enrollment in undergraduate economics concentrations. She has found pervasive unawareness of this gendered skew in economics departments, and suggests that women’s disproportional early attrition from the field, after introductory courses, raises the need to rework the curriculum to stress the discipline’s utility in analyzing socioeconomic problems, not solely its business and finance applications.)


http://harvardmagazine.com/2013/09/where-the-women-aren-t

Or this report of women in medical leadership positions (stat heavy)

https://www.aamc.org/members/gwims/statistics/#.Ur4aGH-9KK0

I can find many more examples.

So a soft war is a good term, I do know that our foot is in many doors threatening what's been taken for granted for years and years. So frightened people, include into some feminists who think it's still about sexuality are only partially right--we are actual competition now, not because we are female, but because we can do the job. You know--the ones 50 years or so ago society thought we couldn't do.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The soft war against women [View all] seabeyond May 2012 OP
This is excellent. Should be in GD. nt redqueen May 2012 #1
wow."if girls learn that behaving like sexual objects earns them approval... they may self-sexualize hlthe2b May 2012 #2
most disheartening thing I have seen...women to become the tool of the patriarchy seabeyond May 2012 #3
How *dare* we judge other women. MadrasT May 2012 #4
lmfao.... was snarkin with you seabeyond May 2012 #5
I had a really rough weekend. MadrasT May 2012 #6
This shit especially pisses me off: MadrasT May 2012 #7
i had a man agressively argue with me on du, that women connect emotion to sex seabeyond May 2012 #8
What? We can't go out and get laid? ismnotwasm Dec 2013 #15
ya. i can remember more than a couple. lol seabeyond Dec 2013 #16
Yep, there'a a lot of junk science. redqueen May 2012 #9
An outstanding article! CrispyQ May 2012 #10
same with the first black president. seabeyond May 2012 #11
I completely agree with that, as well. CrispyQ May 2012 #13
'Zactly. BlueIris May 2012 #12
This message was self-deleted by its author boston bean Dec 2013 #19
kicking for the fun of it. looking for something particular, but we sure have some great stuff way seabeyond Dec 2013 #14
You know reading that ismnotwasm Dec 2013 #17
we can do the job. You know--the ones 50 years or so ago society thought we couldn't do. seabeyond Dec 2013 #18
K&R Tuesday Afternoon Dec 2013 #20
The men at Yale were terribly oppressed by the PROMINENT presence of a WOMEN'S CENTER CTyankee Jan 2014 #21
Glad this was kicked up :) xulamaude Jan 2014 #22
God, so depressing. smirkymonkey Jan 2014 #23
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»History of Feminism»The soft war against wome...»Reply #17