Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
History of Feminism
In reply to the discussion: If we actually lived in a gender-equal society, reproductive rights wouldn't even be *in question* [View all]freshwest
(53,661 posts)12. What a different world it would be, if only...
The Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) was a proposed amendment to the United States Constitution designed to guarantee equal rights for women.
The ERA was originally written by Alice Paul and, in 1923, it was introduced in the Congress for the first time. In 1972, it passed both houses of Congress and went to the state legislatures for ratification.
The ERA failed to receive the requisite number of ratifications (38) before the final deadline mandated by Congress of June 30, 1982, and so it was not adopted.
Full Text:
Section 1. Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.
Section 2. The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.
Section 3. This amendment shall take effect two years after the date of ratification.[1][2]
There is a lot more at the link and information about some surprising opposition to the Amendment:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equal_Rights_Amendment
The ERA was originally written by Alice Paul and, in 1923, it was introduced in the Congress for the first time. In 1972, it passed both houses of Congress and went to the state legislatures for ratification.
The ERA failed to receive the requisite number of ratifications (38) before the final deadline mandated by Congress of June 30, 1982, and so it was not adopted.
Full Text:
Section 1. Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.
Section 2. The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.
Section 3. This amendment shall take effect two years after the date of ratification.[1][2]
There is a lot more at the link and information about some surprising opposition to the Amendment:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equal_Rights_Amendment
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
31 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
If we actually lived in a gender-equal society, reproductive rights wouldn't even be *in question* [View all]
nomorenomore08
Jan 2014
OP
Agreed all around. This stuff really interests (and concerns) me on a deep level.
nomorenomore08
Jan 2014
#5
I understand "trust" is difficult for some people, and I try not to take that personally.
nomorenomore08
Jan 2014
#9
Well according to Christianity, human beings (women especially) are pretty much God's slaves anyway.
nomorenomore08
Jan 2014
#10
The Right Wing believes you sign over ALL of your rights when you trade your services for money...
Spitfire of ATJ
Jan 2014
#14
I don't agree, Yarn. The employers aren't going to pay for the birth control. They are
Squinch
Jan 2014
#24
Imposing religious doctrine on health plans *does* violate church-state separation. Absolutely right
nomorenomore08
Jan 2014
#30
I think the thing that bothers me about this is that Obama came up with a reasonable, good-faith
Squinch
Jan 2014
#31
Except birth control is a basic part of health care. And if it isn't, then why should Viagra or
nomorenomore08
Jan 2014
#29
You would be surprised to find out how many women believe it already passed.
Spitfire of ATJ
Jan 2014
#15
Since I was campaigning for it and the voting age amendment, I paid attention. Some thought that
freshwest
Jan 2014
#16
The usual: They claim they speak for God and that is supposed to win the day.
Spitfire of ATJ
Jan 2014
#19
Hell, some of these people are too dumb to follow that. They think the Jews worship Jesus too.
Spitfire of ATJ
Jan 2014
#28