Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
16. Since I was campaigning for it and the voting age amendment, I paid attention. Some thought that
Sat Jan 4, 2014, 02:42 AM
Jan 2014
Title IX - Gender Equity in Education, already guaranteed much of what was needed. But it has not fully lived up to the dream:

https://www.aclu.org/title-ix-gender-equity-education

Good news at the ERA link, though...

Removal of deadline from the 1972 version of ERA[edit]


On March 8, 2011, the 100th Anniversary of International Women's Day, Representative Tammy Baldwin (D-WI) introduced legislation (H.J.Res. 47) to remove the Congressionally-imposed deadline for ratification of the Equal Rights Amendment.[46] Bill co-sponsors include Representatives Robert Andrews (D-NJ), Jackie Speier (D-CA), Luis Gutierrez (D-IL), Chellie Pingree (D-ME) and Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-FL).[47] On March 22, 2012, the 40th anniversary of ERA's congressional approval, Senator Benjamin L. Cardin (D-MD) introduced (S.J. Res. 39)--which is worded with slight differences from Representative Baldwin's (H.J. Res. 47). Senator Cardin was joined by ten other Senators who added their names to the Senate Joint Resolution.[citation needed]

On February 24, 2013, the New Mexico House of Representatives adopted House Memorial 7 asking, also, that the Congressionally-imposed deadline for ERA ratification be removed. House Memorial 7 was officially received by the U.S. House of Representatives on April 25, 2013, and was referred to the House's Committee on the Judiciary, as noted in the Congressional Record.[citation needed]


113th Congress[edit]

The 113th Congress has a record number of women. On March 5, 2013, the ERA was reintroduced as S. J. RES. 10[48] by Senator Bob Menendez.[49]

All the more reason to GOTV in 2014 and get it passed all through the states. Note, Texas ratified and did not rescind its vote for the ERA. Wendy may or may not be helped by what Congress has been offered.

We've seen how very regressive the 2010 elections turned out to be. We must vote those who faught VAWA, The ACA with its gender neutral rules and the Lily Ledbetter Act, out of office. In these tumultous days we must secure this before other factors come into play to defeat us.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

On this subject, I agree with feminist marxists... Gravitycollapse Jan 2014 #1
thank you for pointing this out niyad Jan 2014 #3
Agreed all around. This stuff really interests (and concerns) me on a deep level. nomorenomore08 Jan 2014 #5
so very, very true niyad Jan 2014 #2
Yup ismnotwasm Jan 2014 #4
Amen and yes, that's 100% true. nt Sarah Ibarruri Jan 2014 #6
yes, and you sound sincere. Tuesday Afternoon Jan 2014 #7
I understand "trust" is difficult for some people, and I try not to take that personally. nomorenomore08 Jan 2014 #9
This message was self-deleted by its author Tuesday Afternoon Jan 2014 #20
I'm gobsmacked that institutions are even *thinking* about giving employers Bette Noir Jan 2014 #8
Well according to Christianity, human beings (women especially) are pretty much God's slaves anyway. nomorenomore08 Jan 2014 #10
The Right Wing believes you sign over ALL of your rights when you trade your services for money... Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2014 #14
They aren't deciding YarnAddict Jan 2014 #23
I don't agree, Yarn. The employers aren't going to pay for the birth control. They are Squinch Jan 2014 #24
I checked the PP site YarnAddict Jan 2014 #25
But why do one person's beliefs trump another person's beliefs? Squinch Jan 2014 #26
Imposing religious doctrine on health plans *does* violate church-state separation. Absolutely right nomorenomore08 Jan 2014 #30
I think the thing that bothers me about this is that Obama came up with a reasonable, good-faith Squinch Jan 2014 #31
Except birth control is a basic part of health care. And if it isn't, then why should Viagra or nomorenomore08 Jan 2014 #29
In such a society, women's healthcare would be considered geek tragedy Jan 2014 #11
What a different world it would be, if only... freshwest Jan 2014 #12
You would be surprised to find out how many women believe it already passed. Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2014 #15
Since I was campaigning for it and the voting age amendment, I paid attention. Some thought that freshwest Jan 2014 #16
The usual suspects.... Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2014 #18
Just heard someone tonight say, "If a woman is out to HERE though..." Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2014 #13
Bet it's all crickets by then, huh? n/t freshwest Jan 2014 #17
The usual: They claim they speak for God and that is supposed to win the day. Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2014 #19
Here is a new and different question to ask those who speak for God: truedelphi Jan 2014 #27
Hell, some of these people are too dumb to follow that. They think the Jews worship Jesus too. Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2014 #28
A big reason the anti choice nuts are more sufrommich Jan 2014 #21
There really IS this puritanical crap linking sex with morality. Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2014 #22
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»History of Feminism»If we actually lived in a...»Reply #16