Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
History of Feminism
In reply to the discussion: In honor of Seabeyond, Trumad, and Intaglio [View all]BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)8. indeed...and i also agree with ismnotwasm's post
Which was hidden.
Oh how true that the provocateurs who enjoy playing games usually know how to be smooth enough to seem acceptable, reasonable. Often they use that "reasonable, logical" way of wording which fools many people.
But look a little deeper and it's clear that they switch topics, twist meanings, employ debunked arguments and ridiculous, unintellectual accusations--such as telling someone they're a prude or have no sense of humor.
When their interlocutors react angrily out of frustration, as the provocateur had hoped, it is then the perfect opportunity to alert.
That's how they work it.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
122 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I see something in A LOT of them that I am pretty sure they are not realizing they communicate:
Squinch
Jan 2014
#84
He got FOUR yesterday? He must have said something perceptive to piss them off so much.
Squinch
Jan 2014
#26
Alerter almost lost their alerting privileges for 24 hours. Some excellent jury comments, thanks
Tuesday Afternoon
Jan 2014
#90
It amazes me what people alert on around here. When I see a post like that has been alerted on
Tuesday Afternoon
Jan 2014
#114
Someone posted a list of MRA debate tactics, which give excellent examples of this.
redqueen
Jan 2014
#17
Well if you do, be forewarned, the feminism and related tags are trolled HARD.
redqueen
Jan 2014
#102
Yes, but it's so hard to ignore that sexist bullshit, especially when you see it here.
SunSeeker
Jan 2014
#40
I have most on ignore (so I can't see the conversations where intaglio got ignored.)
Squinch
Jan 2014
#41
Thank you. As I said to BainsBane, I wasn't thinking. I forgot the transparency page!
Squinch
Jan 2014
#39
But any "obvious animosity" can be addressed by using the jury blacklist (nt)
Nye Bevan
Jan 2014
#97
I don't see it as being fixable. It is seen as unfair and when people feel they have been
seaglass
Jan 2014
#106
I agree, being concerned with fairness may not be the ruling concern for some people. n/t
UtahLib
Jan 2014
#107
No one in this subthread said anything about a conspiracy. Perhaps you are directing your
seaglass
Jan 2014
#119
I imagine that pointing out obvious realities may often be seen as anger...
LanternWaste
Jan 2014
#73
Something deliberately offensive or mean-spirited which toes the line just enough to not be noticed
nomorenomore08
Jan 2014
#87
No argument from me. And it's sad, when most of us probably agree on 90% of the basics. n/t
nomorenomore08
Jan 2014
#89