Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Kelvin Mace

(17,469 posts)
1. Seriously people?
Wed Mar 5, 2014, 03:19 PM
Mar 2014

This is one of those cases that annoys the Hell out of people where lawyers elevate the parsing of the law over the intent of the law.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Seriously people? Kelvin Mace Mar 2014 #1
Charming dipsydoodle Mar 2014 #2
Camera Phone $300 One_Life_To_Give Mar 2014 #3
uhm ... Tuesday Afternoon Mar 2014 #4
Giggity!! BuckIA Mar 2014 #5
40 posts in 4 years and you come out sufrommich Mar 2014 #10
Kinda creepy, little fella... LanternWaste Mar 2014 #12
Another law with a loophole needing to be closed - looks like the MA leg is on this seaglass Mar 2014 #6
unfortunately, this is probably the correct legal decision--the legislature needs to act geek tragedy Mar 2014 #7
No longer OK to take upskirt pics in MA seaglass Mar 2014 #8
This message was self-deleted by its author ismnotwasm Mar 2014 #9
According to the article in LBN, this is incorrect ismnotwasm Mar 2014 #11
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»History of Feminism»High Court Rules That Ups...»Reply #1