Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

seaglass

(8,181 posts)
6. Another law with a loophole needing to be closed - looks like the MA leg is on this
Wed Mar 5, 2014, 05:22 PM
Mar 2014
http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/2014/03/05/mass-high-court-says-upskirting-legal-under-state-law/BMwo1SJPbKtMzzEUwZdjdK/story.html

The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court said today that a state law intended to prohibit “Peeping Tom” voyeurism of completely or partially undressed people did not apply to people who take pictures of people who are fully clothed.

House Speaker Robert DeLeo said this afternoon that the Legislature would immediately begin looking at ways of closing the loophole in the law.

“The ruling of the Supreme Judicial Court is contrary to the spirit of the current law. The House will begin work on updating our statutes to conform with today’s technology immediately,” DeLeo said in a statement.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Seriously people? Kelvin Mace Mar 2014 #1
Charming dipsydoodle Mar 2014 #2
Camera Phone $300 One_Life_To_Give Mar 2014 #3
uhm ... Tuesday Afternoon Mar 2014 #4
Giggity!! BuckIA Mar 2014 #5
40 posts in 4 years and you come out sufrommich Mar 2014 #10
Kinda creepy, little fella... LanternWaste Mar 2014 #12
Another law with a loophole needing to be closed - looks like the MA leg is on this seaglass Mar 2014 #6
unfortunately, this is probably the correct legal decision--the legislature needs to act geek tragedy Mar 2014 #7
No longer OK to take upskirt pics in MA seaglass Mar 2014 #8
This message was self-deleted by its author ismnotwasm Mar 2014 #9
According to the article in LBN, this is incorrect ismnotwasm Mar 2014 #11
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»History of Feminism»High Court Rules That Ups...»Reply #6