Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
History of Feminism
Showing Original Post only (View all)Study Finds That Women Aren’t Run By Their Periods. Scientists Everywhere Confused. [View all]
I wish someone would pay me a bunch of money for these studies. The article is kind of interesting, although heteronormative and focused on male partner preference of course. (Sigh)
What do women want? Over the past two decades, scientists have endeavored to answer this question by bringing women into their labs, asking about their sexual preferences, and then monitoring their menstrual cycles to try to extract clues from the ebb and flow of hormones in their mysterious female bodies. In recent years, these researchers have told us that the status of our monthly cycle on Election Day can influence our decision to favor Mitt Romneys chiseled individualism or Barack Obamas maternal healthcare policies; that our periods determine whether we feel like nesting with our partners tonight or heading out to proposition a stranger; and that our cycle urges us to swing with Tarzan at our most fertile and cuddle up with Clay Aiken when that months egg is out of the picture. Last month, psychologists at the University of Southern California published a meta-analysis of 58 research experiments that tested whether a womans preferences for masculinity, dominance, symmetry, health, kindness, and testosterone levels in her male romantic partners actually fluctuate across her menstrual cycle. The answer: They do not.
The analysis, published in the appropriately-titled journal Emotion Review, looked at studies that used a variety of sociological tools to examine womens preferences for a host of masculine cues, such as a mans gait, body hair, chin length, facial symmetry, or social interactivity, all through the prism of their menstrual cycles. They looked at studies that were focused on testing womens preferences in short term relationships (like one-night stands) and long-term commitments (like marriages), and at studies that didnt specify a relationship type at all. They included experiments that charted a womans menstrual cycle and fertility using hormonal tests and self-reports, ones that included women on hormonal contraception, and those that did not. All in all, they found that both fertile and non-fertile women preferred men who were more masculine, dominant, symmetric, and healthy; that those preferences remained relatively constant across their menstrual cycles; and that they applied to womens feelings about both short-term and long-term relationships. Meanwhile, women who were at the non-fertile stage of their cycleswhere they experience similar hormones to pregnant womendidnt suddenly prefer kinder, gentler men.
http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2014/05/02/menstrual_studies_debunked_women_do_not_make_mating_decisions_based_on_their.html
What do women want is the wrong question. What do people want is the correct one.
14 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Study Finds That Women Aren’t Run By Their Periods. Scientists Everywhere Confused. [View all]
ismnotwasm
May 2014
OP
and earlier this morning I read satire about Sarah Palin and thought it was the truth.
Tuesday Afternoon
May 2014
#4