Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ismnotwasm

(42,484 posts)
18. Nice post!
Sun May 11, 2014, 08:02 AM
May 2014

I just couldn't get through the books--and for quite a few years there there I loved fantasy. Mostly because his build up was too slow, I think-- took too many books, and I lost interest. It was a few years ago, and I don't quite remember the books. Plus I got into women fantasy authors who take brutality to a next level. In all actuality between them, Martin and Jordan-- I was through. I can read history.

I just lost interest in the whole genre after years of reading it. Now my reading is light, or very heavy depending on my mood. I like certain urban fantasy, steampunk, cyberpunk, horror, and Sci-Fi. (that's the 'light" reading)

Your post makes me want to give it another shot, because while I don't watch much TV and will never watch the show-maybe I wasn't being fair to the books.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This message was self-deleted by its author [View all] lostincalifornia May 2014 OP
I sat through two eps during a "free weekend" a few weeks back Doctor_J May 2014 #1
understood, but I have no doubt there are people out there, maybe more than we like to admit, that lostincalifornia May 2014 #2
The scene in the book was a rape scene to me. Whether she liked it or not does not factor in to me. bravenak May 2014 #3
I think because this was not part of the book, and why was it part of the screenplay. In other lostincalifornia May 2014 #5
There are so many deviations now that its not even the same story. bravenak May 2014 #8
Again with this idiotic bullshit excuse. redqueen May 2014 #4
That is true, but in this particular instance, it was not part of the book, and why was it included lostincalifornia May 2014 #6
Any adult with even a passing interest in feminism who spends more than 2 seconds speculating on why redqueen May 2014 #7
agreed lostincalifornia May 2014 #12
That is the issue lost. The showrunners are putting an emphasis on rape that Martin did not. seaglass May 2014 #11
This show seems to have a sub-text of sexually-related violence. yallerdawg May 2014 #9
For some parts it has a purpose. Daenerys is the best example of not only overcoming the abuse, but lostincalifornia May 2014 #13
The one thing they do not mention when they claim they have to show the rapes KitSileya May 2014 #10
I'm telling you ismnotwasm May 2014 #14
Funny how the producers can add sexual violence to Mr Martin's books intaglio May 2014 #15
Very good point. n/t seaglass May 2014 #16
it wasn't a rape scene TorchTheWitch May 2014 #17
Nice post! ismnotwasm May 2014 #18
I admit there was some stuff that I breezed past in the books TorchTheWitch May 2014 #19
I disagree. KitSileya May 2014 #20
I agree that it LOOKED like a rape scene TorchTheWitch May 2014 #21
I still disagree with you. KitSileya May 2014 #22
That was a very good read IronLionZion May 2014 #23
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»History of Feminism»This message was self-del...»Reply #18