Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

merrily

(45,251 posts)
4. Of course, they rationalized by claiming that they could not get assess the
Mon May 19, 2014, 12:09 AM
May 2014

effects drug because they did not know how to adjust for female hormones. They didn't know how to adjust for male hormones, either, but that apparently never occurred to them.

Nor did it occur to them that they had a duty to test a drug on women as well as on men before okaying it for use by everyone, if they thought a drug might affect women differently.

But, what do you expect when you convince women that their role is housewife, then keep them out of colleges and professions? And then, they complain about affirmative action!

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»History of Feminism»How feminist biology is c...»Reply #4