Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
History of Feminism
In reply to the discussion: Start calling out the term 'slut-shaming' [View all]mercuryblues
(15,292 posts)58. from your own keyboard
Seems to me
That the only place I run across this term is in the OP's material.
That the only place I run across this term is in the OP's material.
So you never saw the term or heard the term being used.
It just seems like someone is worrying about a pair of dirty socks
I used to think that way too, Squinch, that if I just stopped thinking about stuff that it wouldn't matter, or if I just kept quiet when someone was charging up the wrong hill that it would all turn out right, or if I could just convince myself that it didn't bother me that I would feel just fine.
But then I read about Rosa Parks. I realized that when there are issues of civil rights and equality, that the stands we take have to be ones that make sense at the time to a large number of people on both sides of an issue.
That's when I realized that the civil rights movement would have made zero progress if, in 1955, Ms. Parks had started insisting people stop using the n-word, rather than taking a stand about the inequality of where a human being could sit based on their color.
It just seems like, with the fretting over the term "slut shaming", that someone is worrying about a pair of dirty socks while the house is burning down.
Calling out the language police at this juncture makes a mockery of the fight for gender equality.
I used to think that way too, Squinch, that if I just stopped thinking about stuff that it wouldn't matter, or if I just kept quiet when someone was charging up the wrong hill that it would all turn out right, or if I could just convince myself that it didn't bother me that I would feel just fine.
But then I read about Rosa Parks. I realized that when there are issues of civil rights and equality, that the stands we take have to be ones that make sense at the time to a large number of people on both sides of an issue.
That's when I realized that the civil rights movement would have made zero progress if, in 1955, Ms. Parks had started insisting people stop using the n-word, rather than taking a stand about the inequality of where a human being could sit based on their color.
It just seems like, with the fretting over the term "slut shaming", that someone is worrying about a pair of dirty socks while the house is burning down.
Calling out the language police at this juncture makes a mockery of the fight for gender equality.
see here you are saying that this is so minor and feminist should focus on only larger issues. Got news for you, women can multi task. IOW women can "fret" about the small stuff and the big stuff at the same time.
Let me put it to you this way. All of this slop goes into a trough. Sure some of it fills the trough up faster than other slop. However the pigs are there on the Q for their feeding frenzy. keeping the trough from getting full, from ALL angles.
here is some help on how often and how the term is being used
https://www.google.com/search?q=slut+shaming&sitesearch=democraticunderground.com&gws_rd=ssl
google gives About 1,190,000 results (0.34 seconds) for the term
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
87 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
language is so important. anyone raising kids know this. that is why we as parents always
seabeyond
Jul 2014
#64
Misogyny. Demonizing women by attacking their sexuality (calling them 'sluts' OR 'prudes')
redqueen
Jul 2014
#21
You also raised another issue here - this idea of 'slut-shaming' is often used to silence criticism
redqueen
Jul 2014
#22
i have used the term also, harshly to one particular man that was all over a thread
seabeyond
Jul 2014
#80
that is the point. we are not discussing the mans sexuality in these terms of prude nor slut.
seabeyond
Jul 2014
#68
Well then, clearly it isn't something you need to think about. Or comment on. As for the rest of
Squinch
Jul 2014
#39
So you are here to tell us that, when we say we don't want to be referred to as sluts, we are
Squinch
Jul 2014
#49
let me clearly state why it is not a little thing but the foundation of all of our misogyny.
seabeyond
Jul 2014
#63
I think you are right about the origin, but I also think Redqueen is right about the fact that it
Squinch
Jul 2014
#40
NO, really, it doesn't. It's a bad choice of words. It is meant to say that women
Squinch
Jul 2014
#50
The term appears to have been created by feminists to denounce the use of "slut" as a slur.
Maedhros
Jul 2014
#45
I agree it should never be used about women, along with the other slurs against them or minorities.
freshwest
Jul 2014
#57