Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
25. I recall we've had a similar discussion before.
Mon Sep 15, 2014, 09:59 AM
Sep 2014

I don't think that I'm 'ignoring and dismissing' what you're actually saying. I'm reading it, but not apparently interpreting it in the way you meant it. And so I respond in a way that you, in turn, interpret as me 'ignoring and dismissing' what you wrote.

So I'll take the blame for failing to understand your communication towards me, but I'll disagree that it a matter of intent to merely ignore and dismiss what you're saying. I am indeed trying to consider what I think you're saying, and respond, even if some of my responses might seem tangential. I often don't feel that a response is needed to things in which we seem to be in agreement, which is why I then 'swing to one side or another' of what you actually said.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

i did not read that thread. i did find the thread about smoking mom with a fetus interesting. seabeyond Sep 2014 #1
I still think that was deliberate. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Sep 2014 #3
it is even more clear who stepped in to champion the fetus. why it would be allowed, is anti smokin seabeyond Sep 2014 #4
I don't know that it's even about the smoking. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Sep 2014 #9
of course. that being said, anti smoking holds a badge of honor in hysteria. nt seabeyond Sep 2014 #11
Thanks for posting that link. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Sep 2014 #2
as far as that goes... any parent, that has look at their two yr old child, in the middle of the seabeyond Sep 2014 #5
It's always possible somebody screwed up Erich Bloodaxe BSN Sep 2014 #6
i am not a dummy, i do not see how anything i have said would allow you to believe that. i have had seabeyond Sep 2014 #13
Sorry if I came off as condescending. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Sep 2014 #18
you did sound condescending. thank you for acknowledging. nt seabeyond Sep 2014 #19
It's my own personal tone problem. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Sep 2014 #21
for me? it was more the ignoring and dismissing what i was actually saying. seabeyond Sep 2014 #23
I recall we've had a similar discussion before. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Sep 2014 #25
gotcha. thanks. nt seabeyond Sep 2014 #26
sea, Tuesday Afternoon Sep 2014 #8
really? and who would have thought, seeing as i have not read the OP, do not care about the OP, seabeyond Sep 2014 #16
understood. Tuesday Afternoon Sep 2014 #20
three women on the board... silenced. regularly. and others, just on the edge of the cliff. nt seabeyond Sep 2014 #22
the abyss ... Tuesday Afternoon Sep 2014 #24
Please be careful what and how you post in here Tuesday Afternoon Sep 2014 #7
You think I should pull the name so as not to damage the group? Erich Bloodaxe BSN Sep 2014 #12
for both reasons that you stated, yes - I would reword. Tuesday Afternoon Sep 2014 #14
I'm not surprised kcr Sep 2014 #10
Exactly = They can dish it out but, they can't take it. Tuesday Afternoon Sep 2014 #15
I've often had a chuckle at some of our most virulent anti-women posters here. Sheldon Cooper Sep 2014 #17
I see at least three posts that would have been hidden if someone 'else' ismnotwasm Sep 2014 #27
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»History of Feminism»The tone argument and iss...»Reply #25