Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

History of Feminism

ismnotwasm

(42,484 posts)

27. I see at least three posts that would have been hidden if someone 'else'

Reply to gollygee (Original post)

Mon Sep 15, 2014, 11:14 AM

Sep 2014

Had said them.

And one so scientifically incorrect it almost makes me want to participate. Almost

But, yes, the tone argument is a common 'shut up ' tactic

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

27 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The tone argument and issues other than feminism [View all] gollygee Sep 2014 OP

i did not read that thread. i did find the thread about smoking mom with a fetus interesting. seabeyond Sep 2014 #1

I still think that was deliberate. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Sep 2014 #3

it is even more clear who stepped in to champion the fetus. why it would be allowed, is anti smokin seabeyond Sep 2014 #4

I don't know that it's even about the smoking. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Sep 2014 #9

of course. that being said, anti smoking holds a badge of honor in hysteria. nt seabeyond Sep 2014 #11

Thanks for posting that link. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Sep 2014 #2

as far as that goes... any parent, that has look at their two yr old child, in the middle of the seabeyond Sep 2014 #5

It's always possible somebody screwed up Erich Bloodaxe BSN Sep 2014 #6

i am not a dummy, i do not see how anything i have said would allow you to believe that. i have had seabeyond Sep 2014 #13

Sorry if I came off as condescending. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Sep 2014 #18

you did sound condescending. thank you for acknowledging. nt seabeyond Sep 2014 #19

It's my own personal tone problem. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Sep 2014 #21

for me? it was more the ignoring and dismissing what i was actually saying. seabeyond Sep 2014 #23

I recall we've had a similar discussion before. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Sep 2014 #25

gotcha. thanks. nt seabeyond Sep 2014 #26

sea, Tuesday Afternoon Sep 2014 #8

really? and who would have thought, seeing as i have not read the OP, do not care about the OP, seabeyond Sep 2014 #16

understood. Tuesday Afternoon Sep 2014 #20

three women on the board... silenced. regularly. and others, just on the edge of the cliff. nt seabeyond Sep 2014 #22

the abyss ... Tuesday Afternoon Sep 2014 #24

Please be careful what and how you post in here Tuesday Afternoon Sep 2014 #7

You think I should pull the name so as not to damage the group? Erich Bloodaxe BSN Sep 2014 #12

for both reasons that you stated, yes - I would reword. Tuesday Afternoon Sep 2014 #14

I'm not surprised kcr Sep 2014 #10

Exactly = They can dish it out but, they can't take it. Tuesday Afternoon Sep 2014 #15

I've often had a chuckle at some of our most virulent anti-women posters here. Sheldon Cooper Sep 2014 #17

I see at least three posts that would have been hidden if someone 'else' ismnotwasm Sep 2014 #27