Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
History of Feminism
In reply to the discussion: first time poster on du spewing anti abortion shit, stands. [View all]cyberswede
(26,117 posts)115. Oh, I see. She made you do it.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
180 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
you want a discussion with a man stating at some point in the 10 months the fetus becomes a child?
seabeyond
Sep 2014
#3
an educated guess. you want to put it to the test? oh wait. hit and run. he is not replying
seabeyond
Sep 2014
#7
by the way, an issue as big as womens bodily autonomy and reproductive rights, i see you nailed
seabeyond
Sep 2014
#9
Aha, that makes sense. I had a problem with my keyboard collecting cat fur and things not working.
uppityperson
Sep 2014
#13
i appreciate your sincerity in your vote. he was a one time poster, hit. he had no interest
seabeyond
Sep 2014
#84
that is the point. he is an obvious troll. and we play all around it. i thought the hide would be
seabeyond
Sep 2014
#94
good to know. i am really looking to see, if i am just so far off on this. my perception totally
seabeyond
Sep 2014
#4
Somebody is here for ...what? 3 minutes?? and they get to insult you?? I think not.
BlueJazz
Sep 2014
#8
tos has nothing to do with letting a post stand. that is community standard. the administration
seabeyond
Sep 2014
#21
Yup, I have had a few private conversations with him about it as well. Bullshit.
PeaceNikki
Sep 2014
#45
you have absolutely no reason to reach an outrageous conclusion. so, the youngest is 21 weeks and
seabeyond
Sep 2014
#27
picking out a time to call a fetus, a child during gestation can in no way lead you to conclude
seabeyond
Sep 2014
#28
None of your business. Keep repeating that. It really is: None of Your Business.
Tuesday Afternoon
Sep 2014
#119
and ALL of those decisions are up to the Woman. And is really None of our Business
Tuesday Afternoon
Sep 2014
#137
this is the point, that i was just saying to another. i do not discuss my personal views, because
seabeyond
Sep 2014
#139
Exactly, that is why they are called personal views. derp. So simple.
Tuesday Afternoon
Sep 2014
#141
this is the problem with your arguments. your own, personalized, caricatures for insult
seabeyond
Sep 2014
#76
"disregard of a late term fetus' humanity." talk about irresponsibly putting words in others mouth
seabeyond
Sep 2014
#96
omg... and this is the fuggin' game i called from your first post, on. you assign it to me and
seabeyond
Sep 2014
#106
that is not my job to prove shit to you. you do not get to assign it to me, simply because
seabeyond
Sep 2014
#109
The stars must have been aligned, I was on this jury too - no comments though :-)
seaglass
Sep 2014
#127
So, anyone can come into our group and chide us for addressing anti-choice rhetoric...
chervilant
Sep 2014
#52
There is a war on women and women's rights, and it's right here on this "democratic" forum
seabeyond
Sep 2014
#73
lol... ya. and they also have their window open to be serving on the juries, too.
seabeyond
Sep 2014
#87
this is clearly, exactly the point. why would we expect anything else. thank you. nt
seabeyond
Sep 2014
#146
Hmm. I can see what you are saying, but he definitely put the "protected" in quotes.
IdaBriggs
Sep 2014
#144
yes he did. he purposely put that there. you are right. and we all heard it loud and clear. nt
seabeyond
Sep 2014
#147
passive aggressive shit.... pisses me off. damn close to jsut saying we are stirring cauldrons,
seabeyond
Sep 2014
#151
throwin' my arm around you woman. i am dealing iwth this stuff, from like three directions.
seabeyond
Sep 2014
#156
and btw... i knew it was not way clear nad too lazy to clarify. my discussion about passive
seabeyond
Sep 2014
#157
actually, i was feeling a connection and unity at the cauldron and cacklin', nothing wrong with a
seabeyond
Sep 2014
#165
i was talking to another, on a totally unrelated part of du, it is certainly NOT a level playing
seabeyond
Sep 2014
#176
thank you chervilant. i do think that everything is crystal clear, and have been given a thumbs up.
seabeyond
Sep 2014
#78
see, you play the passive aggressive game in wording. and that is considered "civil"
seabeyond
Sep 2014
#100
myself and others on the board have had a lot of discussion on passive aggressive behavior, recently
seabeyond
Sep 2014
#104
They supported you right up to the point that they locked you out of the thread.
JTFrog
Sep 2014
#133
i know you are blocked. i wanted to point out. no one claimed you were a stalker.
seabeyond
Sep 2014
#180
What's curious about Juror #3's post is that Skinner has pretty much said...
Hong Kong Cavalier
Sep 2014
#174
Yes, like false accusations of victimhood by claiming people are 'piling on' poor you. Buy a mirror,
PeaceNikki
Sep 2014
#126
Exactly! Had I been on that Jury I would have voted to Hide For MIRt =
Tuesday Afternoon
Sep 2014
#131
Yup. Anti-union - SWIFT hide and shown the door. Anti-woman - "Oh, they are just voicing their
PeaceNikki
Sep 2014
#132
The Message comes in Loud and Very Clear and, since the Democratic Platform does NOT condone
Tuesday Afternoon
Sep 2014
#134
you know. lets quit being hysterical women and simply be pragmatic, factual. guy stuff.
seabeyond
Sep 2014
#142
+1, only to show support, though i know you know. and meh.... to the poster, lol. nt
seabeyond
Sep 2014
#159
thank you. i heard. i thought about editing, but meh... lots of conversation in this thread,
seabeyond
Sep 2014
#161