Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

NM_Birder

(1,591 posts)
35. Everywhere you go, people are the same, even groups
Tue Dec 16, 2014, 09:00 AM
Dec 2014

calling themselves "progressive", or "liberal", or my favorite "The big tent"......... crush themselves under the gravity of the groups own size.

The notion of free and open/honest debate attracts large numbers of people. Then as is the case with any small group controlling the freedom of a larger, what is considered "acceptable" becomes more and more narrow. Ultimately what WAS a platform for the advancement of progressive thinking becomes a strict adherence to specific personal objectives. for example:

reading DU it is virtually mandatory that you believe all cops are racist, black hating murderers. period, good luck with any opinion otherwise. All events everywhere are to be ignored, except the incidents of racist action by less than 1% of police.
reading DU it is unacceptable to discuss any race issue, ....unless white people are blamed in the first three sentences. Otherwise "you don't get it, and are a racist".

reading DU it is absolutely mandatory that you not question a Democrat's political record, and regardless if a Democrat is not the "all knowing soothsayer" as legend tells us, the final solution is to vote them in without question. The DU members running around demanding acknowledgment and the "taking of oaths" to vote Democrat regardless........ is chilling. Being screwed by one party is the only acceptable solution, to being screwed by another .......... so long as obedience is maintained. Both parties screw the people, and the people obediently carry out it's party's marching orders and cut each other down at every opportunity. Again, inspiring.

And now, ..."pussy" is an acceptable term to call a "Rethulican, Repugnant, Republicon" etc etc etc, ....name calling is no longer something that happens occasionally, it is encouraged. And the use of sexist terminology is acceptable because in an ever increasing game of "one up on you", only the most outrageous terminology is given any weight of truth. Sexist terminology is acceptable, questioning the use of sexist terminology is forbidden.

I don't think anyone should be surprised that so many people have left DU, when enough people pee in the pool,.... that peeing in the pool becomes a rule, most rational people get out the water. And what remains is a closed mind, finger pointing exercise in futility, with every "pool pee-er", ....... peeing in the pool and complaining about the pee content in the pool. And then blaming everyone not in the pool for all the pee.

Like others I know,..... we "political mud bloods", (as was jokingly used, ...loved that by the way) became disillusioned with the direction of the Republican party, and basicly drifted away from giving a crap about anything political. I found my way to DU because my girlfriend likes the lounge and a few of the groups, oddly enough not the birding group. Ironic that Democratic Underground, is less flexible in open discussion, and MORE tolerant of socially unacceptable hate speech. I live my life, enjoy my success, and try to better my failures,...... I know I don't belong here, my girlfriend told me so from the start.

Admiring Bernie Sanders is allowed, however thinking independently of the Democratic Party is not, irony thy name is DU.
Take Care Seabeyond, thanks for the opportunity to blather.



Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

MYSOGENY, ask any woman, we will tell you it is real, and it is really happening in this world. Dont call me Shirley Dec 2014 #1
du is morphing with di. nt seabeyond Dec 2014 #2
If I can say two good things about that thread NuclearDem Dec 2014 #3
Yay for the harpies! MuseRider Dec 2014 #4
I can damned well insult you any time I want. seabeyond Dec 2014 #5
Well, jury voted 1-6 to keep it,so... malthaussen Dec 2014 #6
I've put about 30 people on my ignore list this morning, criteria=sexist. I'm trying it to see if seaglass Dec 2014 #7
The ever increasing sexism and misogyny on DU chervilant Dec 2014 #8
the thread in GD was locked, calling out the use of the p word. i was typing a reply to the one seabeyond Dec 2014 #9
the p word is never used for the cowardly woman. it is exclusively used toward men to seabeyond Dec 2014 #10
And yet today I read this in ATA regarding the use of the n-word: JTFrog Dec 2014 #11
thank you for posting this. i needed to know administrations position. nt seabeyond Dec 2014 #12
At least he knows that it's sexist I guess. JTFrog Dec 2014 #13
I don't know what thread you are speaking of. Could you provide a link? boston bean Dec 2014 #14
here you go seabeyond Dec 2014 #15
Well they got the system all locked up in a nice box. boston bean Dec 2014 #17
yet, locking a thread is not dealing with an anonymous jury of whoever. it is set to be consistent. seabeyond Dec 2014 #18
Everywhere you go, people are the same, even groups NM_Birder Dec 2014 #35
To be fair, the hosts are supposed to lock Meta topics. cyberswede Dec 2014 #21
another was locked. we have recently had OPs calling out du racism. those posts stood. why are Op seabeyond Dec 2014 #16
good question, why the hypocrisy? indeed. Tuesday Afternoon Dec 2014 #20
Can you help me out? cyberswede Dec 2014 #22
In the post sea references above, boston bean Dec 2014 #23
I believe the hosts felt that this part was "disruptive meta" cyberswede Dec 2014 #24
Bday cake to make. Can't hunt links. Maybe others can find or later. Yes du was referenced. seabeyond Dec 2014 #25
Thanks...birthday ake sounds way more fun! cyberswede Dec 2014 #28
I did not write the line mentioning MerryBlooms. NM_Birder Dec 2014 #37
Meh-- fuck that ismnotwasm Dec 2014 #19
I would rather have someone doing the real work to help us support our rights Warpy Dec 2014 #26
Words people use show a certain mindset. Ignore it if you want, but I won't. boston bean Dec 2014 #27
Words don't magically go away and they certainly don't if you sit back with your mouth shut seaglass Dec 2014 #29
Right, because whenever I go to my local Democratic office BainsBane Dec 2014 #30
I know huh. Can you imagine a gaveling of the group to come to order boston bean Dec 2014 #31
Hey, fellow HOFers, I feel obliged to warn you... NuclearDem Dec 2014 #32
Oh dear ismnotwasm Dec 2014 #33
yes. havent we all been there. to reply, ON A DISCUSSION BOARD, makes a person a stalker. seabeyond Dec 2014 #36
Ahhh, yes. Lunacee_2013 Dec 2014 #34
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»History of Feminism»Baiting, from one of them...»Reply #35