Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ismnotwasm

(42,486 posts)
9. That's not what was happening, and I don't agree with the comparison
Fri Oct 23, 2015, 12:44 PM
Oct 2015

If they had been able to dominate, and it was a classic male/female dominance paradigm, the comparison would have been crude, and possibly insulting to SA survivors, but more apt. IMO, a rape analogy is only apt when obvious power and dominance is involved, with one side taking advantage of male/white/Cis/hetero/ privilege and patriarchy. Always patriarchy--which is probably why the poster used the analogy. Our entire political structure is based on patriarchy, and the rising female powers have to operate inside it, Hillary has a lot of experience with it, and she, not they, dominated

So they were unable to gain dominance, indeed if they had, it would have been a serious blow to her campaign, not because the allegations are true, but because she would be seen as weak, "female" with all the common sexist bullshit she gets tossed at her "cold" "shrill" "manipulative" "whore"

In fact a more interesting observation to me, is how much of the oft denied or unacknowledged visceral dislike of Hillary comes from her strong political survivors position and obvious power as a female gendered politician. I know that is not a popular topic at DU--thank goodness for feminist blogs.


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»History of Feminism»Comparing the Benghazi he...»Reply #9