I 100% agree with you! Our ever-growing birthrate, coupled with an unsustainable life expectancy, and insatiable pillaging of resources makes for a very dangerous long range math equation.
Perhaps the fact these troglodyte men are not evolving as fast as modern women is an evolutionary tool to make procreation less inevitable or needed.
Another result of the oligarchs, sucking so much wealth from the middle and lower classes is now having a baby has evolved into a financial luxury, that many don’t want to take on. Instead of being propagandized from birth, that you needed to have a baby as a female, many women are discovering, they can have perfectly happy fulfilled lives without falling into a trap that they didn’t see.
I say this as a female who just celebrated 30 years with her committed husband, who is a bigger feminist than I am. If a man can’t find a wife, or even a date, it’s time they start looking inward on what could make them not attractive to the opposite sex or do they have unrealistic “porn star” expectations?
Heterosexual women, like most people, want a partner, but are perfectly content in modern times to remain single rather than be with someone who hasn’t evolved or does not share the same values. They go to college to get an actual degree to advance themselves and be self-sufficient rather than the past ritual of obtaining a “Mrs. Degree”. Not desperately needing a man to take care of us and the modern ability to seek a “no fault” divorce also helps become selective.
Maybe the natural order created natural repellants in Steve Bannon, Andrew Tate, Rush Limbaugh, Jordan Peterson and the rest of the incel army leaders as a new form of birth control?
= new reply since forum marked as read