Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gun Control Reform Activism

guardian

(2,282 posts)

13. At what point would a tax discriminate against the poor?

Reply to Warren Stupidity (Reply #2)

Wed Mar 27, 2013, 12:01 PM

Mar 2013

The 1%ters won't care if the tax is $500/year or $5000/year. But to a single mom, a bus driver, or teacher $500/year is prohibitive. Would you be infavor of a progressive tax based on income?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

15 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

How much should firearms be taxed? [View all] DanTex Mar 2013 OP

I'm not a gun owner LiberalFighter Mar 2013 #1

The purpose of collecting it is to discourage harmful activities and compensate society. DanTex Mar 2013 #7

That is a wide range, but $500/yr seems appropriate if the data is correct. nt. Warren Stupidity Mar 2013 #2

At what point would a tax discriminate against the poor? guardian Mar 2013 #13

This message was self-deleted by its author friendly_iconoclast Mar 2013 #14

if a gun were a necessity you might have a point. Warren Stupidity Mar 2013 #15

I wonder whether the manufacturers pay a tax Kingofalldems Mar 2013 #3

26 U.S.C. CHAPTER 32; 27 C.F.R. PART 53 slackmaster Mar 2013 #4

Good. Kingofalldems Mar 2013 #5

With 10% on each firearm and 11% on each round of ammunition, we're probably pretty close already slackmaster Mar 2013 #6

It's in the ballpark at least. DanTex Mar 2013 #8

Over the life of a firearm, many owners spend far more on ammo than they paid for the weapon. slackmaster Mar 2013 #9

Let's say 1000 rounds per year. DanTex Mar 2013 #10

Until it makes them cry and give up their guns in economics fueled despair. ellisonz Mar 2013 #11

And that is why it will not happen- you propose "a crippling tax of general applicability" friendly_iconoclast Mar 2013 #12