Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gun Control Reform Activism

graham4anything

(11,464 posts)

7. Reinterpret the 2nd, being that originally it never meant private citizens to start off with

Reply to graham4anything (Original post)

Fri Mar 29, 2013, 09:08 AM

Mar 2013

It meant the National Guard and Fema (both of which indeed should be fully armed, to deal with the rightwing extremists who want to overthrow the government.)

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

A new SCOTUS Reinterpretation of the 2nd is the only way true change shall come [View all] graham4anything Mar 2013 OP

And, may I add- the gun lovers and NRA knows this is going to happen just by graham4anything Mar 2013 #1

I have always said that meaningful progress needs to come through gun trade jurisprudence. Loudly Mar 2013 #2

Regulation and tax policy Warren Stupidity Mar 2013 #4

ALL we need is a new reinterpretation graham4anything Mar 2013 #3

Oh yeah, sure. Why not? I mean, fuck it... Serve The Servants Apr 2013 #8

Nice insult Kingofalldems Apr 2013 #9

deerhuntress jimmy the one Mar 2013 #5

seems a little odd markeybrown Mar 2013 #6

Laws are never static in a free society. Ikonoklast Apr 2013 #10

Reinterpret the 2nd, being that originally it never meant private citizens to start off with graham4anything Mar 2013 #7

Of course it meant private citizens. They WERE the militias. Not saying that role jmg257 Apr 2013 #11