Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProgressiveProfessor

(22,144 posts)
1. Most here would agree with your first two
Fri Mar 29, 2013, 11:40 AM
Mar 2013

third one would be more controversial because of what has happened in NOLA and California.

There also are some real practical issues and details that would have to be worked. Neither pols nor discussion groups are good at that, and with guns, the technical and the details matter. For example
- Do we really want to treat interfamily transfers (gifts, inheritance, loans...) the same as buying a new gun?
- The current background check system has inadequate throughput and is FFL specific. It needs to be opened up and improved.
- Federalizing the process should also be considered. It would end the patchwork of current laws. That would make it tighter in Wyoming and looser in California. Objections to that would come from all sides as well.

Criminals, domestic abusers, and the mentally ill are already banned, though it varies somewhat state to state. The real issue is reporting. I have not seen any real opposition to that other than costs.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control Reform Activism»I'd like to try and see i...»Reply #1