Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gun Control Reform Activism

Showing Original Post only (View all)

jimmy the one

(2,720 posts)
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 09:21 PM Mar 2013

I renounce my 2nd amendment right [View all]

I renounce & relinquish my alleged 2nd amendment right to keep & bear arms.

I no longer own any guns & I have no intention of owning any ever again (I only ever owned 2 longguns). The 2ndA means nothing to me as far as gun ownership.

I do not believe in the current 'individual rights' interpretation. The 2ndA in 1791 was written to provide arms for a militia common defense, and was subverted in 2008 by a modern day, politically motivated, rightwing supreme court, into an individual right to keep & bear arms, disconnected from militia service.

The 2nd Amendment today has morphed into some sort of carnival of canards, a 2nd Amendment Mythology. In my opinion the 2nd Amendment does not deserve respect but scorn, & fear - fear that a minority can cause so much indirect carnage and get away with it, literally in plain sight, by using the 2ndA as a pretext to obstruct & do next to nothing as far as reasonable & effective gun control of what they themselves espouse in, guns.

When a right is subverted, & people had adhered to the previous interpretation as dictated by the predominance of historical accounts & law & the judicial system, should they just suddenly shift their entire position 180 degrees to accomodate the new subverted right?
The modern popularity of the individual interpretation is not based upon a proper in depth knowledge of the origins of the 2ndA, but on the preachings, whinings, & propaganda of a biased & profit motivated gun industry & it's lobby.

'A well regulated militia, being necessary for the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep & bear arms shall not be infringed'.
But there is no well regulated citizens militia any more to be necessary for the security of a free state, the 2ndA is antiquated & obsolete, it provides for something which doesn't exist. In 1791 the 2ndA made sense, today it does not, it's outdated. An armed populace keeping & bearing arms today is more a problem than a solution, with 70 gundeaths & near 200 gun woundings daily, every day, of, the, year.
The 2nd Amendment doesn't protect us from anything harmful whatsoever. Nor does it provide for firearm ownership, I can walk down to a gunstore after writing this & buy or order a firearm and have it within a few days after passing a background check, but no '2ndA check' needed.
The 2nd Amendment remains viable due to successful propaganda efforts by the gun lobby, fearmongering about phantom boogeymen & fantasizing about an armed fantasy doctrine. The 2nd amendment today does not serve it's intended constitutional purpose, it supports a carnival atmosphere of guns, gunbanners, gunnaholics, & gunnuts. "Step right up ladysmiths & gents, shoot down 5 duckies & you get an nra certified sharpshooter doll!"

The 2nd amendment mythology makes firearm manufacturers wealthier & wealthier as personal arsenals get stacked higher & higher, and turns young children barely able to walk into killers, leaving an awful legacy once the child reaches the age of reason.
The gun lobby has turned gunowners into believing their possession of highly sophisticated killing machines capable of mass murder done quick, is some kind of neat hobby. That there is some tyrannical govt power just around any corner waiting to turn you into a slave to liberalism. That any form of guncontrol is a camel's nose in a tent to ultimate confiscation of all guns, which leads, of course, to slavery to liberalism & a slow torturous premature death (you didn't know?).
The 2nd amendment now says it's OK for anyone to own military styled firearms, without ever having to serve ONE SINGLE DAY in the army or any well regulated militia.
They say they need the 2nd Amendment for protection, yeah, to shirk responsibility & protect from liability when they subsequently misuse their guns.

Since the 2nd Amendment has been subverted from it's original intent into something contrary to what I believe in, & due the appalling carnival atmosphere the 2ndA has devolved into, and since I have no further desire to own any firearms & have long ago finished obligatory military service & am ineligible for militia, I hereby renounce my 2nd Amendment right to keep & bear arms.
My only regret is it's taken me 4 years to do this.

Note: I am not trying to win a popularity contest, I know some of you will not approve. No problem really. I wanted to start a poll but realize only 'star' members can do so, but do voice your approval or disapproval or ambivalence, as you wish. I also will say, if you have the courage & believe it too, do it too.

BTW, 'jimmy the one' is an english naval term, nickname means the executive officer, every english RMS ship of size has a jimmy on board. I'm not an exalted one or savior or anything, nor ever a real jimmy. Just an ordinary 'chap'.
Royal Navy Colloquial terms in the Royal Navy for the first lieutenant include "number one", "the jimmy" (or "jimmy the one&quot and "James the First". http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_lieutenant

32 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I renounce my 2nd amendment right [View all] jimmy the one Mar 2013 OP
Okay. nt rrneck Mar 2013 #1
Thanks for explaining all of that. Many of us agree with you completely. freshwest Mar 2013 #2
Thanks for the notification. Flatulo Mar 2013 #3
the rich were still the rich back then pasto76 Mar 2013 #4
I read that as "chased a duck through a parking lot" Robb Mar 2013 #6
In his defense Orrex Mar 2013 #10
If everyone did as you have done than only nobody would have guns. Spitfire of ATJ Mar 2013 #5
So what is the "real" 2013 meaning of the 2A? Is it a complete anachronism? geckosfeet Mar 2013 #7
An anachronism because of the Civil War. And now willfully misinterpreted. Loudly Mar 2013 #16
Fine with me. It's a free country. closeupready Mar 2013 #8
Well you really don't have to relinguish any Right Whoopdedoo Mar 2013 #9
I don't own any guns mercymechap Mar 2013 #11
That’s just like, your opinion, man... Malik Agar Mar 2013 #12
Almost Funny. Mine Was Taken ProgressiveJarhead Mar 2013 #13
I agree with you. airplaneman Mar 2013 #14
As long as guns are legal, MicaelS Mar 2013 #15
The mental health aspect is all fine and wonderful... and totally unrealistic. world wide wally Mar 2013 #17
I gave mine up for Lent. jmg257 Mar 2013 #18
Spot on, Jimmy! CapnSteve Mar 2013 #19
How would the free states end slave patrols? Nothing at all about jmg257 Mar 2013 #21
OK, Let me fill in the gaps for you... CapnSteve Apr 2013 #24
Familiar with all that. So how could the congress dis-ban the state militias? jmg257 Apr 2013 #25
You are confusing federal militias with state militias (aka slave patrols)... CapnSteve Apr 2013 #26
Not at all. You are wrong here. The Constitution uses the term "the Militia" jmg257 Apr 2013 #27
OK, now you are just playing with semantics... CapnSteve Apr 2013 #28
Semantics?? What we are REALLY illustrating here is the VERY VALID USE of STATE militias jmg257 Apr 2013 #30
Because there was no federal militias, the congress had powers... jmg257 Apr 2013 #29
revanchism jimmy the one Apr 2013 #31
Ha - as usual - words of wisdom! (And what I have been saying all along ;)) jmg257 Apr 2013 #32
Just don't give up my 2A rights for me. ileus Mar 2013 #20
You are certainly free to do so. Peter cotton Mar 2013 #22
revisionist history - 2ndA jimmy the one Mar 2013 #23
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control Reform Activism»I renounce my 2nd amendme...»Reply #0