Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
8. Chong is saying what I was saying here in the group a while back. A NY assemblywoman is recieving
Wed Apr 3, 2013, 10:49 AM
Apr 2013
death threats for this common sense solution.

From the same uncilivized gangsters who made death threats against representatives across the USA for supporting Obamacare.

Common threads among these nuts, promoted by Koch brothers and weapons manufacturers on hate radio and rightwing cable shows.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Better to also charge a gun seller/manufacturer with the crime itself too graham4anything Apr 2013 #1
Why? premium Apr 2013 #7
Once the SCOTUS/laws changed, nothing more needs to be added to my statement graham4anything Apr 2013 #9
In other words, premium Apr 2013 #10
There's no market (demand) for it BootinUp Apr 2013 #2
There's no market demand for car insurance either. Scuba Apr 2013 #3
I don't think its that simple BootinUp Apr 2013 #4
Just as car owner's who aren't driving are responsible. Scuba Apr 2013 #6
Well if the original gun owner didn't secure his weapon and it was stolen, or he sold it without Hoyt Apr 2013 #13
This message was self-deleted by its author holdencaufield Apr 2013 #5
Chong is saying what I was saying here in the group a while back. A NY assemblywoman is recieving freshwest Apr 2013 #8
I wouldn't worry too much about Ms. Maloney's safety, premium Apr 2013 #11
In her case, maybe. In Texas, those fighting gangsters are on the run now. freshwest Apr 2013 #12
No insurance company is going to pay out for willful, criminal acts, or for actions by someone other slackmaster Apr 2013 #14
Exactly, in which case you gunners won't be insured and in violation of the law. That works. Hoyt Apr 2013 #15
The NRA would simply start selling gun owner insurance.... spin Apr 2013 #16
But less responsible with respect to guns than those who choose not to carry. Hoyt Apr 2013 #17
I will agree that people who don't own guns are responsible with their guns. spin Apr 2013 #18
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control Reform Activism»Tommy Chong knows how to ...»Reply #8