Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gun Control Reform Activism

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)

3. the question did NOT say if you are "accused" of making a death threat

Reply to ProgressiveProfessor (Reply #2)

Wed Apr 3, 2013, 04:58 PM

Apr 2013

it says if you do make one, what should happen.

apparently if a person makes a death threat, you think there are circumstances where they should retain their rights to own firearms.

which explains the lack of rationality seen in your posts on many topics at DU.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

18 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

If you make a death threat towards somebody, you should be banned for life from owning firearms [View all] CreekDog Apr 2013 OP

Oh, yeah? Well, I resent this poll and if you don't take it down I'll... tularetom Apr 2013 #1

Due process matters. As long as it is in someway fairly adjudicated ProgressiveProfessor Apr 2013 #2

the question did NOT say if you are "accused" of making a death threat CreekDog Apr 2013 #3

I considered the question ambiguous ProgressiveProfessor Apr 2013 #4

From one of the biggest negative-Great Equalizer Mike Bloomberg people around. graham4anything Apr 2013 #10

Gunboy from GD apparently all for guns for threateners Kingofalldems Apr 2013 #5

almost everyone voting against this is almost a non-entity outside the Gungeon CreekDog Apr 2013 #14

Depends on the situation and what the judge/jury decide. nt CokeMachine Apr 2013 #6

Before or after they follow through on the threat? We're dealing with officials being threatened. freshwest Apr 2013 #7

If it is a felony and the person is found guilty, no gunz. Warren Stupidity Apr 2013 #9

Note the names of who voted NO above. graham4anything Apr 2013 #11

Thanks for the civil response -- I'll give it some thought. CokeMachine Apr 2013 #13

Anyone that threatens another person's life should be considered to be unbalanced. Ikonoklast Apr 2013 #8

I think it makes sense to elevate a legitimate death threat to a felony. Lizzie Poppet Apr 2013 #12

No offence CreekDog.... defacto7 Apr 2013 #15

"It's a no-brainer." In_The_Wind Apr 2013 #16

But the people with no-brains are still saying no to anything reasonable... freshwest Apr 2013 #17

Tell me about it. In_The_Wind Apr 2013 #18